2026-01-18 18:29:39

I have to say, I still want to thank this project. Although they deleted my post, it doesn't change anything. Some decisions may have seemed necessary at the time, but from a user's perspective, there will still be some discomfort in the heart. But the gratitude is genuine.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainTalker

· 01-21 03:21

actually, let's break this down—censorship feels rough in the moment, but fundamentally speaking, ecosystem dynamics require some moderation trade-offs. still, that gratitude hits different when the sting's still fresh ngl

Reply0

MultiSigFailMaster

· 01-20 19:50

Hi hi, about deleting posts... forget it, the project team also has no way, understood.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 01-18 18:59

lol they deleted your post but you're still grateful? classic protocol governance theater right there. been there—mods gonna mod, but tbh the *opportunity cost* of staying mad is higher than just moving on. value extraction cuts both ways i guess

Reply0

MevShadowranger

· 01-18 18:56

Deleting posts is a bit uncomfortable, but I understand. The project team always needs to maintain their ecosystem. I wonder when that knot in their heart will finally be loosened.

View OriginalReply0

TokenAlchemist

· 01-18 18:51

appreciate the transparency tbh, even if the post nuke stings a bit. but yeah, protocol governance moves aren't always aligned with user expectations—that's just the asymmetric information problem we're stuck with in these ecosystems

Reply0

TokenSherpa

· 01-18 18:48

look, empirically speaking, the governance precedent here is actually pretty revealing if you examine the data on moderation patterns—historically these deletion events correlate with quorum pressure, not bad faith. ngl the tokenomics framework breaks down when sentiment doesn't align with voting power dynamics, but still... respect the transparency at least.

Reply0