2026-01-18 16:25:35

In an era where public blockchains generally pursue all-in-one solutions, DUSK has taken a different path. The project has bet on two directions: privacy DeFi and compliant asset tokenization(RWA).

Simply put, don’t try to do everything. The DUSK Foundation directly allocates 15 million tokens to support developers in these two vertical tracks. On the other side, they are also collaborating with licensed trading institutions in Europe, with a clear goal — to make compliant on-chain asset trading a reality.

What does this focused approach mean? Instead of spreading out and doing half-hearted work, it’s better to go deep and thorough in niche areas. Privacy protection and asset compliance address two needs: one solves user privacy requirements, the other addresses institutional-level compliance demands. Walking on two legs might be more stable than spreading out everywhere.

DUSK-2,44%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GlueGuy

· 01-21 02:20

Compliance is indeed the future, and DUSK has made the right move.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_survivor

· 01-19 16:07

The stance is good, but can it really be implemented in Europe? Just having compliance in name is not enough.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 01-18 16:55

Focusing on niche markets is more practical than just wanting to do everything.

View OriginalReply0

PonziWhisperer

· 01-18 16:35

Finally, some projects are waking up; not everything needs to be done.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirter

· 01-18 16:35

This idea has no problem; it's indeed much more reliable than projects that want to do everything. Privacy plus RWA is truly a necessity, and Europe's compliance route is not just talk. Raising 15 million tokens to support developers—that's real money. Speaking of RWA, it's getting pretty intense now. Whether DUSK can break through depends on execution. Focusing on two tracks is better than trying to cover everything at once, at least it won't end in failure. Compliance is something institutions care most about; if they can really open up the European market... that’s something.

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_not_broke

· 01-18 16:28

Wow, finally a project that doesn't rely on the All-in-One approach. This idea is indeed clear-headed. Privacy + compliance combination, honestly looks a bit strange, but upon closer thought, it's quite brilliant. Spending 15 million tokens on a vertical track is much more rational than those projects that spread themselves thin everywhere, just worried about execution. But if they can really secure cooperation with licensed European institutions, that would be amazing. That's the right path for RWA.

View OriginalReply0