2026-01-18 03:29:22

I didn't expect that this time $BREV rushing to the top would go completely over the limit. The original goal was to hit around 2.1 million and take a snapshot, but I lost focus during the operation and ended up reaching 2.3 million. We should barely be able to get a quota of 5,000 coins.

The current situation is quite interesting—our studio has about 50 accounts participating, accounting for roughly 10% overall, so the level of competition in this round can be imagined as very fierce. The trading volume has reached the top, but there are also many competitors.

There are voices in the community suggesting that the total trading volume of this project could be pushed to 1.5 billion USD, but it is currently stuck at around 450 million USD. Honestly, if it really reaches 1.5 billion USD, most participants will be able to profit from arbitrage.

BREV21,99%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

ChainChef

· 01-21 00:14

ngl the recipe got a lil overcooked when you were stirring the pot... 230M instead of 210M, that's like adding extra salt when you're half-asleep at 3am. but hey, 5k tokens still simmering nicely in the portfolio

Reply0

MemecoinTrader

· 01-20 05:28

lol the sentiment cascade on this is *chef's kiss* — you're literally documenting the exact moment consensus breaks. 50 accounts pushing 10% of volume? that's not participation, that's orchestrated memetic velocity right there

Reply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-18 03:57

2.3 million directly went over the top haha, the operation strength is impressive

50 accounts with a 10% share? That's quite aggressive

1.5 billion USD? Dream on, 450 million at this level is already quite competitive

The term "anti-reward" is used cleverly, who would believe it

You can earn 5000 coins even when distracted, I need to practice my speed

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 01-18 03:57

2.3 million rushing in all at once, this move is quite exciting haha

50 accounts with a 10% allocation each, this scale is indeed aggressive

If the $1.5 billion can really be achieved, then everyone can truly enjoy the benefits

How can you hit such a precise target when distracted during operation? Luck plays a big role

Just need to hit the quota of 5000 coins, greed can easily lead to failure

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-18 03:53

Lost focus again, this hand speed is really incredible

50 accounts only account for 10%? How fierce is this competition

If it's 1.5 billion, then it's really a guaranteed win, but is this thing reliable?

Should have known better than to impulsively chase the high

4.5 to 15... do you believe it? I really don't believe it

View OriginalReply0

quiet_lurker

· 01-18 03:44

This is way over the top haha, reckless operations definitely easily lead to failure.

50 accounts deployed, a 10% share is indeed impressive, considering how fierce the competition in the circle is.

1.5 billion USD? How many people would it take to pile that up?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-18 03:32

Operation was distracted and overdone, this round is a bit social anxiety haha

Definitely insider tactics, 50 accounts directly profit

The figure of 1.5 billion USD is a bit hard to imagine

The studio's pace can never be contained, always doing this set

Honestly, this quota system has a bit of that flavor

Reaching 2.3 million and still getting 5000 coins? Lucky brother

There are a bunch of competitors, but occupying 10% already is pretty fierce

The term "anti-reward" has been used a bit frequently lately

Now 450 million is stuck, still a long way from the goal

Distracted operation actually made a profit, really unbelievable

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 01-18 03:32

50 accounts account for 10%? This data is quite interesting, indicating that participants are extremely concentrated, and there's still a long way to go before true decentralization of power.

View OriginalReply0