2026-01-17 17:23:10

When a project developer steps directly into the CTO role by sidelining the previous holder—claiming it's for 'community interests'—you have to wonder what's really going on. The whole situation reeks of power consolidation dressed up as community governance. A dev taking control of core technical leadership without proper transparency or community consensus? That's not community-first decision-making, that's just consolidating power under a different banner. The irony is pretty thick here.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TradFiRefugee

· 01-20 09:37

It's that same "for the community" rhetoric again... I think they just want to ditch the former CTO and solidify technical control at the same time.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaskVictim

· 01-20 01:26

It's the same old "for the community" excuse again, hilarious. Isn't it just wanting to ditch the former CTO to monopolize the voice?

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-19 08:15

Coming back with this again? "Removing the former CTO for the benefit of the community," sounds good, but in reality, it's just a power struggle.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOSapien

· 01-18 16:41

Ha, it's the same old "for the community" rhetoric, and then they turn around and seize power—typical power game tactics.

View OriginalReply0

SelfSovereignSteve

· 01-17 17:53

A typical "for the community" trick, who would believe it...

View OriginalReply0

TopEscapeArtist

· 01-17 17:50

This is another good show. The developer directly becomes CTO. The so-called grandeur is actually a transfer of power. I see this trend is similar to a head and shoulders top pattern—appearing stable but actually a fake-out. Dangerous signals have already appeared.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTalker

· 01-17 17:49

actually, let's break this down through the lens of incentive structures—when devs invoke "community interests" while quietly shuffling leadership, you're basically watching governance theater masquerading as decentralization. the irony is *chef's kiss* honestly.

Reply0

OvertimeSquid