2026-01-17 11:35:56

The Web3 programmable infrastructure track is worth关注. $LITKEY provides encryption and access control infrastructure, which is a key component of Web3 security. $LUMIA focuses on infrastructure and scalability, and although it does not specialize in native privacy, it has a broad coverage. $MTP takes a privacy-first approach, mainly working on privacy routing and infrastructure. These three projects each have their focus—security control, performance expansion, and privacy protection—covering the core demands of the Web3 foundational layer.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

defi_detective

· 01-19 14:14

Infrastructure definitely needs to be studied carefully, but the fact that LUMIA has such a wide coverage makes me a bit worried... Will it end up doing everything but not excelling at anything?

View OriginalReply0

fomo_fighter

· 01-18 16:23

Infrastructure is indeed worth paying attention to, but to be honest, I have reservations about LUMIA's broad coverage. If privacy isn't a focus, it's hard to justify claiming core demands... MTP is a more solid path to take.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-17 21:54

Infrastructure definitely needs to be closely monitored, but I feel like LUMIA's coverage is too scattered.

I'm more into the focused privacy approach like MTP; privacy is the lifeline.

LITKEY's security controls sound good, but I wonder how well they are implemented in practice.

Combining these three can indeed fill in the gaps, and the track still has potential.

Wait, is there really such a big shortage of privacy infrastructure? Feels like everyone is just patching holes.

But to be honest, whoever does it well will benefit; I'm just keeping an eye on it for now.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSage

· 01-17 11:48

The infrastructure sector is indeed competitive, with all three stacking narratives... However, LITKEY's security control aspect still has some substance; it depends on whether it can truly be implemented later on. LUMIA's expansion approach is good, but it feels a bit broad and comprehensive. In contrast, LITKEY, which focuses on doing one thing well, seems more reliable.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-17 11:39

Infrastructure shovel business looks pretty good, but there are only a few who can survive until the next cycle...

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationOracle

· 01-17 11:37

The infrastructure layer has indeed become competitive, but the question is which of these three can survive until the end... They all sound quite reasonable.

What I truly believe in are those that can find a balance between security and scalability; otherwise, just talking about privacy routing is of little use.

Will this infrastructure bull market be a fleeting moment again?

I think LUMIA's approach to coverage is quite good, and having stronger generalization ability seems to make it easier to survive.

View OriginalReply0