#Strategy加仓BTC 【Internal Trading 642x Return】12 SOL turned into $1.07 million, and this RALPH trade went viral.



On-chain data platform Onchain Lens captured an interesting transaction record: on January 17, the internal address of the RALPH project acquired 28.8 million tokens for less than $1,700, specifically costing 12.3 SOL. Now, this position is worth $1.07 million. The multiplier? 642 times.

This is a typical story in the crypto market—how lucrative early participation can be. But this also sparked quite a bit of discussion about information asymmetry, fairness, and the hidden risks involved. Some people see the profits and get excited, while others are contemplating the market order behind it all. In short, chasing high returns is tempting, but you need to keep your eyes open.
BTC-0,75%
SOL-1,54%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaservip
· 01-19 16:02
It's another story of insiders bottom-fishing; retail investors are just getting screwed.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 01-19 12:45
It's the same old story again, internal personnel get the meat while we drink the broth.
View OriginalReply0
not_your_keysvip
· 01-17 07:11
642 times? Isn't this just the rhythm of the inner market harvesting the little guys? What are you pretending for?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9vip
· 01-17 07:02
642 times? This internal address is too impressive. How can we, the retail investors, compare?
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamervip
· 01-17 06:58
It's the same insider story again. Those who knew earlier made a fortune, while we, who found out later, are still sleepwalking.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureAnxietyvip
· 01-17 06:51
It's all about these internal addresses, wake up everyone.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemurvip
· 01-17 06:46
No way, 642 times? This is obviously messing with us; internal addresses always have the advantage.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHuntervip
· 01-17 06:46
Damn, 642 times? We'll never be able to play with the active internal addresses. The information gap is just that brutal.
View OriginalReply0
CantAffordPancakevip
· 01-17 06:44
642 times? Damn, what kind of trick is this? The internal address must be cheating.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin