Recently, the SENT project is about to launch TGE, and the design of its tokenomics is worth analyzing.

First, let's look at the unlocking mechanism. SENT adopts a one-year cliff plus six years of linear release, for a total cycle of seven years. What does this mean? The team and investors have zero release on TGE day, and must endure a full year of vacuum. The six-year gradual release cycle forces the team to deeply commit to AGI development, tightly binding short-term interests with long-term goals over ten years. This design is quite strict compared to current market standards—and it also reflects the project's sincerity.

Next, consider the allocation ratio. The community portion—including airdrops, incentives, and R&D investments—accounts for 65.55% of the total supply. This proportion is relatively high among similar projects, offering participants a good opportunity.

The most interesting part is the pricing logic. The official has clearly stated that the fully diluted valuation (FDV) during the public sale phase, which involves complete dilution, will be lower than the institutional funding round, and even below the actual cost basis of institutional investors. In a market flooded with overvalued projects with low circulation, this design indeed stands out as somewhat unique. From an participant's perspective, this level of pricing transparency and alignment mechanism is quite rare.