2026-01-15 21:56:05

Recently, a series of policy adjustments on Twitter have sparked quite a bit of discussion. Interestingly, some voices question the targeting of these measures.

From the data, the proportion of spam tweets on the entire Twitter ecosystem is not actually high; it is just a branch within the spam sector and does not rank among the mainstream in the cryptocurrency field. In comparison, discussions related to Meme coins are actually quite substantial.

If the goal is to reduce bot responses, this logic also seems questionable. How significant is the presence of bots across the entire Twitter platform? This is worth pondering. More importantly, before this wave of governance, gray-market bots had already existed. Why have these longstanding issues not been systematically addressed, but instead targeted now in specific fields? The sequence itself is thought-provoking.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StillBuyingTheDip

· 01-18 06:15

Selective enforcement, a typical example. I really don't understand, why not go after the meme coins? They've built a big facade, but in reality, they're just picking easy targets. This move is a bit baffling, where are the data? Use data to speak. Illicit activities have existed for a long time, why only think about it now? The timing feels a bit suspicious.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamer

· 01-15 22:24

嘴撸确实不主流啊，反而Meme币的讨论量大得多，这选择性执法属实有点... 针对机器人都这么多年了，为什么偏偏现在动手，还专挑这一块？确实有点可疑。等等，灰产机器人之前就存在，这次怎么突然开始管？逻辑对不上啊。说白了，这波操作看起来更像是有针对性的，而不是真的为了生态。真就选择性治理呗，就这样。

Reply0

OnlyOnMainnet

· 01-15 22:21

It's all selective enforcement. To put it nicely, it's precise strikes; to be blunt, it's just someone wanting to target whoever they want. Wait, what about the gray market's front-running? Why haven't they been cracked down on? This logic indeed doesn't hold up; it just seems like they're looking for an excuse. Honestly, it's still driven by interests. Some voices are too loud and need to be silenced. When robots were everywhere, there were no issues. Now targeting a specific sector? That's laughable.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 01-15 22:19

Caterpie accidentally stepped on some sensitive spot... Even though its share is so small, they still target it specifically. This move is indeed outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

AllTalkLongTrader

· 01-15 22:01

Selective strikes, huh? This trick has been played out. Really funny, gray industry bots have been around for so many years without anyone caring, and now they're getting anxious. The data is right here, and it's very targeted. Interesting. Why aren't they discussing meme coins? Double standards confirmed. Old problems are not being solved, and they keep looking for scapegoats. Twitter's recent moves are indeed interesting. It's outrageous. Why didn't anyone mention the bot ratio before? The proportion of spam accounts is already small, and they insist on using it as an excuse. Let's just be honest.

View OriginalReply0