Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
A major social media platform recently made adjustments to its posting reward API, directly disabling such interfaces. This move caused the growth narrative of some Web3 projects based on the platform to collapse instantly — the once popular Infofi concept now seems a bit awkward.
From another perspective, this might be a cleanup in the industry. Projects that rely on traffic strategies are gradually losing their appeal, and the market is beginning to return to rationality.
However, there's a question I want to clarify: I heard that some projects have set relatively long staking periods, requiring about 15 days to unlock? What is the design logic behind this lock-up period? Can knowledgeable friends explain?
Waiting 15 days to unlock? Isn't that just preventing you from running away? It's a blatant move.
Talking about returning to rationality, I think it's just a mess.
But speaking of which, before this API was banned, those projects didn't care about logical issues... they were blinded by traffic.
Locking for 15 days is a bit excessive. The logic is just to trap the leeks eager to cash out.
Clean it up, anyway, there are too many scammers in this circle.
Wait, 15 days unlock? Basically, this lock-up period is just to give the project team time to run away.
The concept of Infofi was originally just hype, and now it's quickly falling apart.
Why would truly valuable projects rely on API gameplay? The problem is, not many can withstand it.
The industry should clean up once and for all; too many scam projects with high "IQ tax" should be gone.
But on the other hand, this wave of regulation has actually highlighted real opportunities.
I also want to know the logic behind the 15-day design; just looking at it, it seems like a trap.
15-day unlock? Basically, it's just locking your chips, afraid you'll run away.
This cleanup is quite necessary; at last, we can see clearly who truly has a product and who is just air.
---
15-day unlock? Isn't that just a disguised way to scam money? Why are people still accepting it?
---
To be honest, the platform's recent operations are quite hardcore. Projects that exploit API loopholes should really be cleaned up.
---
Wait, you can only withdraw after a 15-day staking period? This design is clearly to prevent you from running away.
---
Another round of weed whacking—let's see who can survive.
---
Cleaning up junk projects is fine, but the problem is good projects are also affected.
---
Long lock-up periods are meant to prevent you from dumping your assets in a hurry. Honestly, it shows a lack of confidence in the track.
---
Now you know what "cleaning" means, right? What’s meant to come cannot be avoided.
---
Is Infofi really gone? They hyped it up so aggressively last year.
---
A 15-day unlock is really outrageous. Isn't it just a disguised asset freeze?
15-day lock-up? Isn't that just to prevent people from fleeing? Speechless.
This kind of "cleanup" is basically a reverse operation of the principle of good money driving out bad money. Quite interesting.
Setting such a long staking period feels like playing with time differences. If it really makes money, why bother with such tricks?
Once the social platform bans the API, the entire narrative chain collapses. This is like a castle built on sand.
What does it mean if it can be unlocked in 15 days? This kind of project clearly lacks confidence and fears liquidity shocks.
Honestly, projects that rely on platform bonuses are inherently unhealthy. Someone should have stepped in and stopped it long ago.