To ensure the longevity of a public chain, the design of the token economic model is crucial. Taking DUSK as an example, its value accumulation logic is not solely supported by token burning or hype speculation, but is built on more practical demand.

**First is the basic demand for Gas and transaction fees.** All transactions, smart contract deployments, privacy computing operations on the DUSK chain, as well as subsequent RWA asset issuance and transfers, require DUSK to pay for network fees. As applications like DuskTrade go live and ecosystem activity increases, this fee demand forms a solid value base.

**Second is the demand from validators and stakers.** This chain uses a PoS consensus mechanism, where validators and delegators must lock DUSK to participate in maintaining network security. This reduces circulating supply and increases the cost of attacking the network. The protocol typically rewards stakers with a portion of transaction fees or newly issued tokens, encouraging long-term participation.

**Looking further ahead, there are also protocol-level profits.** If in the future DUSK generates commercial revenue through advanced privacy services or RWA platforms, community governance may decide to use part of the income to buy back DUSK from the market for ecosystem investment, increased staking rewards, or token burning. This can directly translate the network’s commercial success into returns for token holders—though the specific implementation depends on decentralized governance. If you're interested in investing, it’s worth paying attention to governance proposals and their developments.