2026-01-13 16:28:03

Reviewing $TIMI's performance, it indeed confirms the initial prediction—with an entry cost of around 150,000, the phenomenon of reaping profits is obvious, and there were also significant price spikes in between.

Since the previous "Sunny" incident, it has become clear what the nature of such projects is—completely aimed at exploiting users, with no real vision. Do these kinds of tokens rely on buying at low prices to profit from the difference? Honestly, it's too difficult.

At that time, I noticed that the wear and tear cost far exceeded the token price itself, and this signal couldn't be clearer—if the situation is unfavorable, you must cut and run decisively. This judgment also saved me. A few brothers in the group also asked about entry points at that time, and I had estimated that to make it onto the leaderboard, a volume of about 150,000 was needed, and the final data basically matched.

The lesson is: focus on the project's fundamentals and liquidity depth, which is much wiser than blindly chasing high prices.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-14 06:20

I've long seen this as a trap to harvest retail investors, I ran as soon as the wear and tear costs appeared. After that wave of Sunny, there's really no way to play anymore; these kinds of markets are just not sustainable. A threshold of 150,000, and such aggressive anti-rebound tactics—no wonder so many people in the group are losing money. The key is still to look at the fundamentals; don't follow the trend and chase highs, it's too easy to get caught. I've already given up on this type of project; investing time and energy into reliable projects is the real way to go.

View OriginalReply0

MetaNomad

· 01-13 16:55

I knew it, I shouldn't have looked at this coin. I've been cutting losses so much it's exhausting.

View OriginalReply0

FomoAnxiety

· 01-13 16:52

I've been saying this thing is a trap, and some people still can't bear to cut losses. After the Sunny Day incident, still trusting this kind of project, you must have a very clear mind. The wear and tear costs have already broken the coin price, and you still want to make a profit from the price difference? Don't be ridiculous. I left back then, just for this reason, a crucial judgment. With a market cap of 150,000, it ranked on the list, and the accuracy was incredible; brothers later verified it. The fundamentals are weak, no matter how cheap it is, it's still a trap.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyLemur

· 01-13 16:44

I saw this was a trap a long time ago. Why put in 150,000 just to chase after something? --- Wear and tear costs exploded. I saw through this signal back then and decisively ran away. --- Since the Sunny Day incident, I haven't touched this type of project. The scope is too small. --- Honestly, the arbitrage strategy at low prices doesn't work anymore. You still need to look at the fundamentals. --- That guy in the group insisted on joining. I tried to dissuade him but couldn't. He’s still not break-even after all this time. --- Liquidity depth is the key point. Many people don't understand this. --- Poking the needle until you question your life. Anyway, I’ve already run away.

View OriginalReply0

LostBetweenChains

· 01-13 16:41

There are still people jumping into the 150,000 trap, really outrageous --- Even with such obvious anti-dumping, some still hesitate to run away, how strong must their mentality be --- I knew this thing was done when the wear and tear costs exploded --- After the Sunny Day incident, are there still people believing in projects like this? Laughing to death --- A lack of liquidity in the fundamentals is a deep pit, nothing worth researching --- Trying to buy low and sell high? Bro, stop dreaming --- The few people in the group asking me about entry, I directly advised them to back off --- Injecting into the brink of bankruptcy, this routine is too classic --- Thinking of making the top with a 150,000 scale? Wake up, everyone --- The key is to see through the project's essence, don’t get caught by the leek-cutting

View OriginalReply0