Regarding project investment screening, I use a six-dimensional evaluation system.

First is the **industry track**. This is the most fundamental and critical point—no matter how strong the team is, if the industry hits a ceiling, it's all for nothing. Check whether the project's specific sub-sector has enough imagination space; this directly determines the upper limit.

Next is the **structural performance of financials**. It's not about short-term numerical fluctuations, but whether there are genuine signs of improvement in the overall financial health.

The third is **revenue sustainability**. Being able to make money is one thing; being able to do so consistently and stably is another. This tests the resilience of the business model.

**Moats** determine competitiveness. Whether a sustainable, hard-to-copy advantage has been formed is the guarantee of long-term value.

**Product positioning** is also crucial—whether it remains at the conceptual level or has already created real value deep within the industry chain. The difference is huge.

Finally, there is the **team**. Talent and execution ability often decide whether strategies can truly be implemented.

In my work, I use ChatGPT Pro as a research assistant, which greatly improves analysis efficiency. When combined with this framework and good tools, it can cover the key dimensions of project evaluation.