I cast my vote against the governance proposal regarding the Net Change Limit spanning from Epoch 613 through Epoch 713, representing 37.71 million ADA held by my delegators.



Here's my position: A 350 million ADA spending ceiling simply exceeds what makes sense. Treasury management demands rigorous fiscal oversight—we can't afford loose spending discipline. When you're stewarding community assets on this scale, conservative budgeting principles matter more than ever.

On-chain governance works best when token holders enforce real accountability. Excessive withdrawal limits create unnecessary risks and dilute the purpose of having structured treasury controls. My view is straightforward: tighter constraints protect long-term ecosystem health far better than permissive frameworks.

This vote reflects my commitment to responsible capital stewardship for the community.
ADA0,91%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-6bc33122vip
· 01-15 16:23
350 million ADA, isn't that too outrageous? It feels like no one is managing it.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiOrRektvip
· 01-15 12:27
3.5 billion ADA cap? Bro, that's way too loose. Should have opposed it long ago.
View OriginalReply0
FreeRidervip
· 01-15 07:38
350 million directly released? What are you thinking, isn't this just messing around?
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者vip
· 01-15 02:25
3.5 billion is really outrageous. How much can you spend? Why not just open it up directly?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaservip
· 01-12 16:53
350 million ADA? The cap is way too outrageous, gotta manage this money well.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAOvip
· 01-12 16:52
350 million ADA? Bro, are you joking? The cap is ridiculously high.
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDipsvip
· 01-12 16:48
3.5 billion cap? That number is obviously ridiculous. Someone must dare to tell the truth.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpstervip
· 01-12 16:35
350 million ADA? This cap is simply outrageous; everyone would have to oppose it.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeatervip
· 01-12 16:27
Good morning, 2 a.m. Withdrawal limit of 350 million ADA? This is a textbook example of a liquidity trap, and the robot paradise is about to open again.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin