Post

I cast my vote against the governance proposal regarding the Net Change Limit spanning from Epoch 613 through Epoch 713, representing 37.71 million ADA held by my delegators.



Here's my position: A 350 million ADA spending ceiling simply exceeds what makes sense. Treasury management demands rigorous fiscal oversight—we can't afford loose spending discipline. When you're stewarding community assets on this scale, conservative budgeting principles matter more than ever.

On-chain governance works best when token holders enforce real accountability. Excessive withdrawal limits create unnecessary risks and dilute the purpose of having structured treasury controls. My view is straightforward: tighter constraints protect long-term ecosystem health far better than permissive frameworks.

This vote reflects my commitment to responsible capital stewardship for the community.
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.
ADAADA-1.48%


Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
No comments