Seeing this headline, you probably want to roll your eyes—28 times in three months? Here we go again, some "big V" is just fooling people. But I want to be honest: the most ironic phenomenon in this industry is that the more seemingly foolish methods there are, the more they can expose human weaknesses. I stayed up at 3 a.m. monitoring the crypto market, not because I was anxious and couldn’t sleep, but like a robot executing strategies to the end. Today I’m sharing this trading approach; veteran investors might say it’s "too cheap," but it’s precisely this counter-human "stick to it" spirit that helped me survive in the volatile market of 2025.

**How can small accounts survive? Divide 6000U into 60 parts**

Invest only 100U per trade—sounds like an old lady bargaining at the market, but this is the bottom line for survival. I’ve seen too many people go all-in at once, only to get liquidated and then curse the market for being rigged. My rules are strict: the first trade can lose at most 1% of the total funds; only after making a profit can I gradually increase the position according to a formula. For example, if the first trade earns 20U, the next position becomes 102U, but still within 2% of the total funds.

How many tuition fees did I pay to learn this lesson? In 2024, I heavily invested in SOL, only to see it drop 30% in one day. That’s when I realized that money management isn’t some advanced strategy; it’s the survival bottom line. Even the most precise signals must leave room for black swans.

**Dual-cycle resonance is the real signal**

I never believe that a single indicator can dominate everything. My entry conditions must satisfy two criteria simultaneously: on the 1-hour chart, the 7-day moving average crosses above the 21-day moving average with volume increasing by more than 1.5 times; on the 4-hour chart, the MACD turns red below the zero line, and RSI must be below 45 (a rebound signal in oversold territory). Filtering with these conditions kills 90% of false signals.