2026-01-08 21:25:49

Looking at the $FISH chart, this momentum is interesting. If it can break through the current resistance level and push towards a 100M market cap, there is still quite a lot of room for growth. Recently, on-chain data has also been accumulating, so it might be worth continuing to observe the subsequent price performance and trading volume trends. 🌈

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

27 Likes

Reward
27
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TheMemefather

· 01-11 05:35

Once the breakout occurs, we'll start moving; if not, we'll keep averaging down.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 01-10 22:05

Let's see if FISH can break through the resistance level this time; it feels promising.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-09 23:05

Can breaking the level reach 100M? That's a bit overthinking, haha.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 01-08 21:55

100M market cap? First, check the liquidity depth on DEX, and once the slippage data is out, you'll know if it's real or fake.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocDetective

· 01-08 21:54

Breaking below 100M? Now it's all about whether we can withstand this wave of pressure.

View OriginalReply0

HalfIsEmpty

· 01-08 21:54

Breakthrough, break through, let's see if 100M can be absorbed.

View OriginalReply0

nft_widow

· 01-08 21:52

Breaking the level is just waiting to see the show, but I bet 100M can't go that far at all

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 01-08 21:49

Breakthrough 100M? Wake up, how many more trapped orders are stacked in front?

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 01-08 21:40

On-chain data accumulation? Please provide specific metrics. Diagnosis records need to be detailed; otherwise, it's all superficial. Breakouts of resistance levels also require confirmation with trading volume; otherwise, it's just false strength.

View OriginalReply0