The Financial Services Commission (FSC) of South Korea recently changed its stance and officially supported the central bank's strict restrictions on stablecoin issuance. This proposed revision was announced on January 8 and immediately sparked industry discussion.
The core requirement of the new regulation is straightforward—stablecoin issuance must be led by banks. Specifically, banks need to hold more than 50% of the shares, and while technology companies can become the largest shareholders, their shareholding must be below that of the banks. In other words, the actual control of financial institutions is being strengthened.
The capital threshold has also been significantly raised. Issuers are required to have at least 5 billion KRW (approximately $3.7 million) in paid-in capital, and regulators reserve the right to further increase this standard based on market development. For trading platforms, the pressure is equally substantial. The new regulation mandates platforms to improve the stability standards of their IT infrastructure, and if losses are caused by hacking attacks, they must bear compensation responsibilities. Violating platforms face severe penalties—fines can reach up to 10% of annual revenue.
This proposal reflects the differing views among South Korea's ruling party, financial regulators, and the central bank. How the policy will ultimately be implemented remains to be seen as all parties continue to negotiate.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketSunriser
· 01-11 02:09
Here comes another round of cutting leeks, this time in Korea.
Bank holding over 50%? Tech companies step aside? Laughing out loud, this is the old finance guys fearing disruption.
The 5 billion won threshold... discourages a large number of participants.
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 01-09 21:02
Here comes the old trick of harvesting profits again—banks want to control stablecoins? A typical old power figure's crackdown on new technology.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 01-08 16:37
Here comes the crackdown on stablecoins again. Korea seems to want to completely push out tech companies.
Banks want to control over 50%, so no matter how wealthy tech companies are, they have to bow their heads—this is essentially a disguised financial monopoly.
A threshold of 3.7 million USD, small projects are directly discouraged—it's clear they want to keep the big players.
The platform is supposed to compensate hackers? Laughable. Who would dare to create stablecoins then?
Policies are not finalized yet, everyone is bickering, just waiting to see if there will be another reversal.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivor
· 01-08 10:50
Here comes another stablecoin? Korea is really trying to fully financialize crypto. With a 50% bank stake+ this move is brilliant. Tech companies have completely become wage earners.
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickster
· 01-08 10:50
Oh no, now the Korean banks want to take the stablecoin market into their arms, and we players have to think of other ways to arbitrage.
---
Starting from 5 billion KRW, which small project can cross this threshold? Looks like we have to rely on the banks.
---
A 10% annual income penalty, which is more exaggerated than my losses in 2017. The platform must be much more cautious.
---
Haha, it's another power game between financial institutions and tech companies. Retail investors can only wait and watch.
---
Once these rules are in place, the profit arbitrage space for stablecoins will be squeezed tightly, and we need to find new channels for reinvestment quickly.
---
Bank control exceeds 50%, definitely a protective umbrella for financial oligarchs, but still better than wild growth.
---
Yet again, another country is pulling Web3 back into centralization. Korea's move is quite ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChill
· 01-08 10:41
Here we go again, it's that "banks must control" routine again, which is really suffocating.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 01-08 10:25
Bank monopoly over stablecoins? The old hands have no confidence at all.
The Financial Services Commission (FSC) of South Korea recently changed its stance and officially supported the central bank's strict restrictions on stablecoin issuance. This proposed revision was announced on January 8 and immediately sparked industry discussion.
The core requirement of the new regulation is straightforward—stablecoin issuance must be led by banks. Specifically, banks need to hold more than 50% of the shares, and while technology companies can become the largest shareholders, their shareholding must be below that of the banks. In other words, the actual control of financial institutions is being strengthened.
The capital threshold has also been significantly raised. Issuers are required to have at least 5 billion KRW (approximately $3.7 million) in paid-in capital, and regulators reserve the right to further increase this standard based on market development. For trading platforms, the pressure is equally substantial. The new regulation mandates platforms to improve the stability standards of their IT infrastructure, and if losses are caused by hacking attacks, they must bear compensation responsibilities. Violating platforms face severe penalties—fines can reach up to 10% of annual revenue.
This proposal reflects the differing views among South Korea's ruling party, financial regulators, and the central bank. How the policy will ultimately be implemented remains to be seen as all parties continue to negotiate.