【BitPush】The Indian financial regulatory authorities have recently reiterated their concerns about the cryptocurrency trading ecosystem. This reaffirmation is not unfounded—tax authorities have explicitly pointed out the compliance risks associated with offshore trading platforms, self-custody wallets, and the DeFi ecosystem. Where is the core issue? The inherent characteristics of crypto assets determine that: they can facilitate anonymous, cross-border, near-zero latency value transfers, and users can even completely bypass traditional financial intermediaries. This makes tax tracking akin to finding a needle in a haystack.
From a tax policy perspective, the Indian government’s stance is somewhat contradictory. On one hand, it imposes a flat 30% tax on all crypto asset gains, along with a 1% withholding tax on any transfer transactions—undoubtedly one of the strictest tax regimes in the industry. On the other hand, the Indian authorities recognize the legality of cryptocurrencies and even allow a leading trading platform to re-enter the market in 2025.
This complex policy posture reflects the true predicament faced by regulators: they want to maintain tax order and financial security, but do not want to completely cut off the lifeline of this emerging market. But ultimately, the scale of control seems to be leaning more heavily in that direction.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenRationEater
· 30m ago
India's move is really brilliant—imposing a 30% heavy tax on one side while allowing platforms to return. Isn't this just a way to harvest a wave of retail investors?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 6h ago
honestly india's playing 4d chess here... 30% tax + 1% TDS is basically saying "we want your money but also kinda hate you" lol. statistically speaking, that's the move to either kill adoption or generate massive compliance arbitrage opportunities. theoretically the offshore + self-custody combo they're sweating about is actually just basic risk management on their end tbh
Reply0
FadCatcher
· 01-08 09:28
India's recent moves are truly outrageous, with a 30% tax rate plus 1% withholding tax. Honestly, it's just to kill trading activity... On one hand, they recognize legality, and on the other, they are cracking down hard, which is purely contradictory.
DeFi players probably need to change their approach because this tax system can't be contained.
By the way, is the Indian government really trying to regulate or just trying to push people out?
The combination of 30% + 1% is indeed harsh, no wonder everyone is moving on-chain...
It feels like India is walking a tightrope, wanting tax revenue but afraid of scaring away the market. In the end, neither side benefits.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 01-08 09:28
India is really having fun with this move—charging a 30% tax on one hand and allowing exchanges to return, basically just trying to fleece users.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardian
· 01-08 09:15
India's move is really clever—imposing a 30% tax to choke the industry while simultaneously allowing a major platform to return. Isn't this a classic case of a tug of war?
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeOnChain
· 01-08 09:11
India's set of measures is indeed tough; a 30%+1% withholding tax directly discourages people... but then they allow exchanges to resume trading, isn't that contradictory? Where is the promised regulation?
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 01-08 09:08
India's recent moves are truly impressive—imposing a 30% tax rate to squeeze every last penny, while simultaneously pretending to support crypto. Do they really want to promote it or just kill it?
India Takes Strong Action: New Trends in 30% Crypto Taxation and DeFi Risk Management
【BitPush】The Indian financial regulatory authorities have recently reiterated their concerns about the cryptocurrency trading ecosystem. This reaffirmation is not unfounded—tax authorities have explicitly pointed out the compliance risks associated with offshore trading platforms, self-custody wallets, and the DeFi ecosystem. Where is the core issue? The inherent characteristics of crypto assets determine that: they can facilitate anonymous, cross-border, near-zero latency value transfers, and users can even completely bypass traditional financial intermediaries. This makes tax tracking akin to finding a needle in a haystack.
From a tax policy perspective, the Indian government’s stance is somewhat contradictory. On one hand, it imposes a flat 30% tax on all crypto asset gains, along with a 1% withholding tax on any transfer transactions—undoubtedly one of the strictest tax regimes in the industry. On the other hand, the Indian authorities recognize the legality of cryptocurrencies and even allow a leading trading platform to re-enter the market in 2025.
This complex policy posture reflects the true predicament faced by regulators: they want to maintain tax order and financial security, but do not want to completely cut off the lifeline of this emerging market. But ultimately, the scale of control seems to be leaning more heavily in that direction.