Mentioning the name Walrus, many people's first reaction is to laugh — in a crypto circle filled with "Labs, Protocol, Chain, AI," this name indeed seems a bit casual. But interestingly, recently this "unspectacular project" has been frequently appearing in the investment lists of big players, discussions in tech communities, and various narrative hotspots.
There is actually a logic behind this.
⸻
**The data layer that is collectively ignored, Walrus has found a breakthrough**
In the crypto world, there is an invisible hierarchy of disdain: L1 > L2 > DeFi > AI > Meme. Data storage? Usually at the bottom — recognized as slow, bulky, and lacking storytelling.
But Walrus flips this around. It doesn't compete for the hotness of the execution layer, nor does it compete with DeFi for yields, instead it focuses on a nearly untouched blind spot: "How can on-chain data be stored long-term, securely, and cheaply?"
It sounds dull, but this is a problem that cannot be bypassed.
NFT storage, AI training sets, Web3 social content, on-chain game data, and even future on-chain videos and model weights — fundamentally, they all ask the same question: blockchains can keep accounts, but can they truly "remember"?
Walrus's real ambition lies in this seemingly ordinary question.
⸻
**Counterintuitive, it's not actually about technology, but about design thinking**
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FundingMartyr
· 17h ago
Wow, a project called Walrus has been forcefully developed to the point where big players are just copying the work, which is truly outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 01-09 03:02
Haha, the name is indeed funny, but I increasingly believe that this kind of "boring" foundational layer is the real gold mine.
View OriginalReply0
PoolJumper
· 01-08 21:53
Hmm... the name Walrus is indeed awesome, and it's actually easier to remember.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 01-08 09:00
The name "Walrus" is indeed clever, but I didn't expect anyone to actually bet on this thing.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxiety
· 01-08 08:45
Wow, no one really cares about the data layer, huh? Now that Walrus is messing around with it, it's kind of interesting.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_again
· 01-08 08:37
To be honest, no one really wants to play with data storage, but the name Walrus is really awesome haha
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrain
· 01-08 08:35
Speaking of Walrus, the name is indeed unique, turning the "unwanted" job into a hot commodity.
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 01-08 08:31
Haha, the name is indeed a joke, but the logic is truly solid.
Speaking of data storage, no one really plays in this area, Walrus is coming up with a surprising move.
But can it really hold up... Let's give it a try.
Mentioning the name Walrus, many people's first reaction is to laugh — in a crypto circle filled with "Labs, Protocol, Chain, AI," this name indeed seems a bit casual. But interestingly, recently this "unspectacular project" has been frequently appearing in the investment lists of big players, discussions in tech communities, and various narrative hotspots.
There is actually a logic behind this.
⸻
**The data layer that is collectively ignored, Walrus has found a breakthrough**
In the crypto world, there is an invisible hierarchy of disdain: L1 > L2 > DeFi > AI > Meme. Data storage? Usually at the bottom — recognized as slow, bulky, and lacking storytelling.
But Walrus flips this around. It doesn't compete for the hotness of the execution layer, nor does it compete with DeFi for yields, instead it focuses on a nearly untouched blind spot: "How can on-chain data be stored long-term, securely, and cheaply?"
It sounds dull, but this is a problem that cannot be bypassed.
NFT storage, AI training sets, Web3 social content, on-chain game data, and even future on-chain videos and model weights — fundamentally, they all ask the same question: blockchains can keep accounts, but can they truly "remember"?
Walrus's real ambition lies in this seemingly ordinary question.
⸻
**Counterintuitive, it's not actually about technology, but about design thinking**