The United States suddenly announced the withdrawal from 66 international organizations, a decision that has stirred waves in the global political arena. Among them are 31 United Nations agencies and 35 other international organizations. The White House's reasoning is straightforward—these organizations no longer align with America's core interests.

The most aggressive move in this wave is the "one-size-fits-all" approach targeting climate-related organizations. Following the previous withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the US further exited the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. What does this mean? The voice of the clean energy sector will be redistributed among other countries.

The timing is also quite interesting. The United Nations is experiencing its most severe financial crisis in history, with a 7% budget cut and 3,000 layoffs. The US's divestment acts are like adding insult to injury. From UNESCO to WHO, from the Human Rights Council to various specialized agencies, withdrawing from organizations has become routine. The Secretary of State was also blunt, stating, "American taxpayers' hard-earned money will no longer flow to these inefficient organizations."

The multilateral system is now in a vacuum, with both funding and leadership missing. For those of us watching the crypto market, there is only one key question: with rising geopolitical risks and the continuous depletion of the dollar's credit, can BTC, known as "digital gold," absorb safe-haven funds this time?

Historical experience tells us that whenever there is a major adjustment in the global order, super-sovereign cryptocurrencies tend to become safe havens for capital. This time, it may be no exception. An era that redefines global rules might be changing the investment landscape in the crypto world.