Recently, the Walrus($WAL) airdrop has attracted a lot of attention. Users who participated in the tasks earlier have been receiving wallet airdrops one after another. There are still spots available, so interested parties should seize the opportunity to participate.
Speaking of this project, it’s worth looking at it from two perspectives.
From an optimistic point of view, Walrus indeed has several advantages: firstly, its technical promises are quite attractive. The team claims that its storage solution costs are significantly lower than similar competitors. If it can achieve large-scale commercial use, it will have a substantial impact on the industry; secondly, as the native storage layer of the Sui public chain, it directly benefits from the entire ecosystem’s developer base and ecosystem dividends, showing considerable development potential; additionally, it is backed by top institutions like a16z and Franklin D. Roosevelt, and has launched a Grayscale trust product. These are all factors that support confidence in the project.
However, risks are also evident. First, valuation and selling pressure are concerns. The fully diluted market cap is indeed high, and with the gradual unlocking of investor tokens, there will be considerable selling pressure in the future; second, technical implementation remains uncertain. There is currently a lack of large-scale commercial validation, and actual performance and stability still need to be verified; third, competitive pressure is intense. Storage projects like Filecoin and Arweave, which have been around for years, are formidable opponents. Competing for market share from them is no easy task; finally, historically, projects like this are particularly sensitive to events like airdrops and unlocks, which often trigger significant price volatility.
Therefore, this project has both potential and practical challenges. Investment should be approached with caution and careful consideration.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FalseProfitProphet
· 5h ago
wal sounds good, but I still don't quite believe it. With backing from a16z and Grayscale Trust, this combo has been overused.
Unlocking pressure is indeed deadly; historically, projects that unlock often experience a sharp decline.
Technical implementation is the real test; just shouting slogans is useless.
View OriginalReply0
BoredStaker
· 10h ago
a16z endorsement sounds good, but Filecoin has been stuck for so many years. Can it really overtake on a curve?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizard
· 21h ago
Another "technical promise." Do you understand what it means to create wealth with a PPT?
With such a high valuation and still needing to unlock, no wonder big influencers are raving about it.
If Filecoin can't handle it, why should this one succeed?
Airdrops are both unlocking and selling pressure. How are you supposed to play this?
Just trusting a16z's endorsement? What about history and lessons learned?
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-08 08:52
Well, a16z endorsement can indeed be impressive, but FIL and Arweave have already secured their spots. I'm still taking a wait-and-see approach regarding WAL.
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefather
· 01-08 08:50
It looks like yet another story of "we have big institutional backing." Does having a16z support guarantee no sharp decline? Haha
The real pressure to sell only comes when the unlocking wave hits. The implementation of technology is still a big question mark.
Forget it, I'll just wait and see how Filecoin responds. This battle won't be easy.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 01-08 08:49
Daring to boast about cost advantages without reviewing the audit report is as critically flawed as a reentrancy attack.
View OriginalReply0
Token_Sherpa
· 01-08 08:39
ngl the tokenomics here are screaming velocity trap... a16z backing doesn't suddenly fix unsustainable unlock schedules lol
Reply0
AirdropHunterXM
· 01-08 08:26
It looks like another routine of "endorsement + ecosystem + airdrop." Why is a16z backing so effective?
---
Honestly, with the unlocking wave coming, the market will probably drop again. Filecoin hasn't achieved any major accomplishments.
---
Should I participate quickly? I think it's better to wait. These storage projects usually end up failing due to technical implementation issues.
---
With such a high circulating market cap, I feel like someone is trying to cash out.
---
The Sui ecosystem benefits are real, but it also depends on whether it can be used in the end.
---
Once Grayscale Trust is launched, institutions should start to run, I tell you.
---
Airdrops are collected and then run; don't expect to profit from arbitrage. This thing is too sensitive.
---
Another "great vision + huge risk," a typical project in the crypto space.
---
No matter how beautiful the technical promises are, they are useless. Arweave has been the same for years. Why can Walrus break through?
---
I just want to know when investors will start unlocking, then it will be showtime.
Recently, the Walrus($WAL) airdrop has attracted a lot of attention. Users who participated in the tasks earlier have been receiving wallet airdrops one after another. There are still spots available, so interested parties should seize the opportunity to participate.
Speaking of this project, it’s worth looking at it from two perspectives.
From an optimistic point of view, Walrus indeed has several advantages: firstly, its technical promises are quite attractive. The team claims that its storage solution costs are significantly lower than similar competitors. If it can achieve large-scale commercial use, it will have a substantial impact on the industry; secondly, as the native storage layer of the Sui public chain, it directly benefits from the entire ecosystem’s developer base and ecosystem dividends, showing considerable development potential; additionally, it is backed by top institutions like a16z and Franklin D. Roosevelt, and has launched a Grayscale trust product. These are all factors that support confidence in the project.
However, risks are also evident. First, valuation and selling pressure are concerns. The fully diluted market cap is indeed high, and with the gradual unlocking of investor tokens, there will be considerable selling pressure in the future; second, technical implementation remains uncertain. There is currently a lack of large-scale commercial validation, and actual performance and stability still need to be verified; third, competitive pressure is intense. Storage projects like Filecoin and Arweave, which have been around for years, are formidable opponents. Competing for market share from them is no easy task; finally, historically, projects like this are particularly sensitive to events like airdrops and unlocks, which often trigger significant price volatility.
Therefore, this project has both potential and practical challenges. Investment should be approached with caution and careful consideration.