2026-01-08 08:23:34

When it comes to privacy protection in Web3, many people still only talk about it verbally. What's the problem? Many identity systems are still stuck in the old centralized data storage model, where user information can be exposed at any time. The risks are numerous.

idOS Network's approach is different — privacy is designed as a fundamental logic, not just a patch added later. Through encryption and self-managed mechanisms, user data is no longer stored centrally on a server, truly allowing users to control their own information sovereignty. This is what Web3 should be doing.

From a technical perspective, this architectural shift is highly significant. It not only addresses individual risks but also redefines the trust model of identity verification. The exploration of decentralized identity systems offers valuable insights for the entire ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AlphaWhisperer

· 2h ago

Well said, finally someone has awakened. The centralized approach really needs to be eliminated. --- Treating privacy as a patch? It's long overdue to reflect on this routine. --- Bottom-layer privacy design is the true way; everything else is just pointless tinkering. --- Information sovereignty in your own hands—that's what Web3 should look like. --- Decentralized identity is indeed worth researching, but implementation depends on execution capability. --- The centralized storage approach should have been phased out long ago; why are so many projects still using it? --- Redefining architecture? This time it might really not be just hype. --- Designing privacy as the top priority—this idea is quite innovative. --- Rebuilding the trust model sounds impressive, but I don't know how far it can go. --- Finally seeing projects take this seriously; before, it was all talk.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysMissingTops

· 01-09 20:21

Well said. The centralized approach has long been outdated. Forget it, it's just another new concept. How exactly will it be implemented? Talking about privacy protection is useless if there's no action. True information sovereignty sounds good, but I'm afraid it might just be empty talk. Self-managed data? First, someone really needs to do it before bragging. This kind of underlying logic, I've heard it a hundred times. The key still depends on the results. The centralized data approach is indeed fragile. This direction is correct. It sounds ideal, but will users really switch over?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 01-09 14:58

Basically, most projects are just hyping up their claims, and few truly prioritize privacy. Topic tag: #Web3 #Privacy The centralized storage approach really should be phased out; it's no different from having nothing at all. Fundamental privacy design is indeed the right way; it's more reliable than patching things after the fact. I agree with the idea behind idOS; finally, someone got it right. Privacy is not just a feature; it should be a foundation. Unfortunately, not many people understand this.

View OriginalReply0

MondayYoloFridayCry

· 01-08 08:53

Once the underlying logic is well established, there will be no need for patches later on. idOS has indeed thought this through clearly. After saying all this, it all depends on who truly dares to give the data rights back to the users.

View OriginalReply0

BearHugger

· 01-08 08:45

That's right, the centralized approach indeed needs to be phased out. Using privacy as a patch? That idea itself is flawed. Design privacy into the core layer—that's the right way. Finally, someone is doing it right.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-08 08:43

Sounds good, but I've heard this logic too many times. How many actually implement it effectively? Most of the time, idealism runs into reality and stalls.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-44a00d6c

· 01-08 08:35

To be honest, most Web3 projects currently do a poor job with privacy; it's always after the fact analysis. Alright, this approach is still acceptable; hardcoding privacy logic at the core level rather than patching it later.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDoomsDay

· 01-08 08:34

Truly reasonable, the centralized approach should have been thrown into the trash long ago. Making privacy a patch? Haha, that's laughable, like a post-hoc armchair strategist. The core logic is the gameplay; there are indeed few projects that grasp this point.

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 01-08 08:30

It's easy to talk about it nicely, but there are very few projects that can truly make privacy trustworthy at the node level. Verification efficiency is the real key metric.

View OriginalReply0