TMX DEX contract on Arbitrum hacked: $1.4 million lost, attacker cleverly exploits minting-staking-exchange cycle

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】A serious security incident has occurred on the Arbitrum network. According to CertiK’s monitoring data, an unaudited contract associated with the decentralized exchange TMX was hacked, resulting in approximately $1.4 million in losses.

The hacker’s tactics are not particularly complicated, but executed very cleverly. They repeatedly perform a set of actions: first mint TMX LP tokens, then stake them to exchange for USDT and other assets, then convert USDT into the USDG stablecoin, and finally unstake and sell large amounts of USDG. Through multiple cycles, the hacker successfully drained USDT, wrapped SOL, and WETH from the contract little by little.

This incident serves as a reminder of how risky unverified DeFi contracts can be. Before participating in any liquidity mining or staking projects, always ensure that the contract has undergone professional security audits.

SOL5,05%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
MechanicalMartelvip
· 01-08 17:14
It's the unverified contract causing trouble again—1.4 million lost. The combo of minting, staking, and swapping is truly unbeatable.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizardvip
· 01-08 06:10
honestly, the mint-stake-swap loop is just... *statistically speaking*, a pretty textbook extraction mechanism once you map out the liquidity flows. 1.4M gone because nobody bothered auditing? ngl that's negligent, but also kinda predictable given how many unaudited contracts are just floating around rn
Reply0
RugDocDetectivevip
· 01-06 03:09
It's another case of an unaudited contract causing trouble. This minting-staking-exchange cycle is essentially infinite money printing. TMX is really in trouble this time.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 01-06 03:09
Once again, an unverified contract causing trouble. How many times has it been 1.4 million now? Truly unbelievable.

---

TMX's minting-staking-exchange process is really straightforward and brutal. Hackers have exploited the vulnerabilities thoroughly.

---

No way, here we go again. Arbitrum needs to investigate how many more hidden issues there are.

---

The USDG to USDT cycle... It seems the contract design never considered someone would play like this.

---

Watching hackers repeatedly siphon funds, I just want to ask: where did the audits go? Still daring to launch without verification?
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugsvip
· 01-06 03:00
Once again, it's the unverified contract causing trouble. These project teams really need to be more cautious.

---

Minting - Staking - Exchange cycle, in simple terms, it's just the old trick of repeatedly scamming users. I find it embarrassing to even prevent this.

---

1.4 million gone, just blatantly swept off the chain, it's ridiculous.

---

I knew that the Arbitrum ecosystem projects are a mixed bag, and sure enough, another one has appeared.

---

TMX got away this time, but to be honest, I've seen this kind of vulnerability several times before.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMastervip
· 01-06 02:55
Another unverified contract, these projects really need to be more cautious

---

Mint - Stake - Exchange, cycle and cut, this method is almost a template now

---

140,000 just gone like that, it’s painful to watch

---

Launching without an audit, no wonder it gets hacked. Remember this lesson next time

---

This trick is basically just a way to get something for nothing, with a lot of contract design flaws

---

Arbitrum security really needs to be rectified, hackers are too rampant

---

USDT converted to USDG for cash-out, quite thoughtful, but the contract gave the opportunity

---

Another painful lesson, how many projects dare to skip audits and go live
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin