Switzerland has once again demonstrated its special status in the global financial system. The quick freezing of assets belonging to Maduro and his associates, involving 37 individuals, is indeed noteworthy for its speed.

Thinking carefully, what does Switzerland's ability to swiftly lock down so many related individuals imply? It indicates that they have long held a complete database of deposit accounts. This isn't a temporary investigation; it's a pre-compiled big data set.

This raises an interesting question: among the top figures active in the global political circle, there are only a few thousand. Their asset data volume isn't as large as one might imagine. If such data is fully controlled by Switzerland, the risk of complete data leakage is a real concern.

Moreover, from a historical perspective, it's not a matter of if, but when. The centralized management model of financial data is essentially a ticking time bomb in the era of big data. The emergence of encrypted assets, to some extent, is a countermeasure against the traditional monopoly of financial data. This is also why assets like BTC and ETH tend to attract attention during periods of political and economic instability. Liquidity tokens like LDO are also gaining increasing importance due to their decentralized nature.

When the security of traditional financial data faces challenges, the value of encrypted assets becomes even more prominent.