2026-01-05 14:27:11

Dear veteran traders, I have a question about a trading strategy. Have you ever tried closing your positions just before the fee deduction moment, then immediately opening a reverse order? Would this theoretically allow you to bypass the fee? I'd like to hear everyone's thoughts on this approach—am I overcomplicating things?😄

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
5
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

Web3Educator

· 01-08 11:21

okay so here's the thing—let me break this down for you. closing right before funding hits then flipping reverse? that's not really circumventing fees, you're just... paying them twice lol. you're literally printing transaction costs for yourself 😅

Reply0

WalletWhisperer

· 01-06 05:04

nah, that's just moving liquidity around—the fee mechanics don't care about your order sequencing. watched enough wallet clusters doing this exact dance... they all get rekt by the same slippage anyway. behavioral pattern recognition says you're overthinking the friction layer here.

Reply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-05 14:56

You're overthinking it, bro. The exchange has already fixed this vulnerability long ago.

View OriginalReply0

OPsychology

· 01-05 14:55

Bro, I've played this trick before, you can't bypass it at all

---

What are you thinking? The fee is still deducted, same old story

---

The theory sounds great, but in practice? Slippage is arranged for you properly

---

I've tried this approach early on, and ended up losing big

---

Wait, isn't this hedging? Double the fees, brother

---

You didn't understand the logic of deducting fees, did you?

---

You're overthinking it, the exchange has long anticipated your plan

---

It's not about making it complicated, but about keeping it simple

---

If it were really so effective, big players would have made a fortune long ago

---

Are you dreaming? Reverse orders are charged the same way

---

This is just self-deception, and the costs are actually higher

View OriginalReply0

not_your_keys

· 01-05 14:33

Sounds like you're trying to scalp, but you still have to pay the fees, brother.

Reverse orders will still be charged, and you can't extract anything.

This trick has long been monitored by exchanges, don't bother.

There are no free lunches when it comes to fees; closing positions in reverse won't escape either.

You're overthinking it, haha. The exchange's algorithms are more sophisticated than ours.

View OriginalReply0