Why is this wave of Bitcoin correction so mild? The crypto world is buzzing with all kinds of opinions.



Recently, some media analysis was quite interesting — BTC's performance in 2025 is indeed different from previous years. What's the key change? The expansion of ETFs has become the main driver, and the recent pullback has been much smaller than in the past four or five years. More painfully, the operation logic of traditional funds has been influenced by macroeconomic factors, and the purely technical and emotional aspects of the crypto market have been diluted.

Now the market is clearly divided: on one side are the bearish voices, expecting BTC to undergo a significant correction, even to lower levels; on the other side are optimists, directly shouting slogans like "aiming for $150,000 by the end of the year, and targeting $250,000 by 2027." The gap is indeed large.

Interestingly, BTC has successfully entered the realm of traditional finance, but to reach the social recognition and mainstream status of gold, industry insiders generally believe it will take another 5 to 10 years. This timeframe seems quite realistic.

Back to the present — with such a small correction, is it possible that traditional funds are quietly positioning for a takeover? Is the end-of-year target of $150,000 just a story for the market, or is it genuinely possible? Let's wait and see how these funds operate and what heights BTC can ultimately reach.
BTC2,7%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentSagevip
· 01-06 09:37
These $150,000... feel like a story told to the retail investors. Institutions are quietly accumulating chips, while we are still discussing theories on paper. Once ETFs are launched, Bitcoin will change its flavor, and it will never return to being a pure crypto circle. It takes 5 to 10 years to gain a golden status? Then what am I holding? Such a mild correction is actually more dangerous. The most terrifying thing is being unable to recover in one go. The bearish camp is not wrong; Bitcoin should have had a fierce move long ago. Institutions take over the buy-in, let them do it. Anyway, retail investors are always the last to know. Pushing for 150,000 by the end of the year, I bet this is just a cover-up to let retail investors buy the last batch. Traditional funds coming in instead kill the soul of the crypto world. This wave is a double-edged sword.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 01-06 09:18
ETF entry indeed changes the game rules, but $150,000 feels a bit exaggerated. Traditional funds stepping in is a fact, but don't forget they can also dump the market. Just wait and see, after all, we're all just leeks. This round of adjustment is indeed mild, but vigilance is the hard truth. Large funds positioning to buy in? Uh... I think it's more like a prelude to harvesting the leeks. It will take 5 to 10 years to reach golden status? I think you're dreaming.
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者vip
· 01-06 08:56
This ETF really changes the game; once traditional funds come in, the small waves in the crypto circle won't be able to stir up much. Can it reach $150,000 by the end of the year? Honestly, I don't believe it, but I also don't dare to bet everything on a short position. Wait, think about it the other way around— the more gentle the approach, the more likely it is that big funds are accumulating. When they start pushing the market, it might catch us off guard. Traditional finance methods are smooth, but we crypto folks are actually not used to it haha. The bearish and optimistic camps are debating; the middle ground is where the profit is. This has been understood for a long time. Reaching a golden status in 5 to 10 years? I might not live to see it, but this expectation is definitely more reliable than back then.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBardvip
· 01-03 10:50
Traditional funds stepping in? This wave has been too smooth, it's a bit suspicious. --- Once ETFs started, the pure frenzy in the crypto world was diluted. --- 150,000? 250,000 in 2027? Are they just storytelling? I’d rather see if I can hold onto 120,000 first. --- It takes 5 to 10 years to catch up to gold status? How long do I have to live to relax then? --- The bearish and optimistic camps are fighting fiercely; I’m just sitting back and watching who gets proven wrong. --- This wave of adjustment is so mild; either institutions are quietly accumulating, or the market has been tamed. --- Macroeconomics has confused everyone in the crypto circle; all technical and emotional aspects are gone. Now it’s just about reading the Fed’s mood. --- The real question is—if traditional funds come in, can we still make such satisfying profits? --- Ending the year aiming for 150,000, does the person saying this truly believe it or are they just trying to cut the leeks? --- Strange, this position was smashed long ago in previous years. Why is it still holding on stubbornly this year?
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentalsvip
· 01-03 10:41
Once ETF is launched, even the pullbacks become gentle. This is the power of traditional capital. $150,000? Just hearing about it is enough; the funds decide everything. This time, it’s really not as exciting as in previous years, a bit boring. Once traditional finance intervenes, the pure blood of the crypto world gets diluted. Wait and see, big funds definitely have backup plans. It takes 5 to 10 years to catch up to gold’s status? Then maybe we’re still early in this wave. Ultimately, it’s still a matter of who is taking the over, not the price.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66vip
· 01-03 10:40
Traditional capital inflows have indeed changed the game, but the figure of 150,000 is a bit questionable. --- After the ETF opened, retail investors' say really isn't that strong anymore, it feels like being manipulated in reverse by institutions. --- Wait, does a mild correction mean someone is backing the buy? I can't accept that logic. --- 5 to 10 years to become like gold? I'm afraid I won't live to see that day haha. --- The huge difference between bearish and bullish signals shows that no one really understands what the market is doing right now. --- Macroeconomic disruptions, purely technical analysis completely falling apart, the crypto world has become a move in the grand financial chess game. --- Can the 150,000 be reached by the end of the year, or are we just telling stories to fool the retail investors again? --- The operational logic of traditional funds is actually more heartbreaking; we retail investors have long been left behind. --- A mild correction is even more frightening; big funds are holding back a major move. --- It's tough, the wild nature of the crypto world has been tamed into a pet of traditional finance.
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPullvip
· 01-03 10:27
Traditional capital taking over, I believe in it. Once ETFs open up, the gameplay changes. --- 150,000 USD? Let’s see how Wall Street manipulates it first. --- Honestly, there must be big players controlling the market behind this gentle adjustment. --- The pure emotions in the crypto world have been diluted, and that’s the most heartbreaking part. --- Five to ten years to stand shoulder to shoulder with gold? Bro, you’re way too optimistic. --- Aim for 150,000 by the end of the year, 250,000 by 2027? Wake up, first check how the macroeconomy is doing. --- I just want to know, is this time a story or real gold and silver. --- The entry of traditional finance actually makes it less exciting, a bit boring. --- Such a small adjustment, either the bagholders are coming in, or everyone is waiting for the next move. --- Gold’s position is not so easy to dominate, BTC is still early. --- The gap between the bears and bulls is so big, there’s still room for survival in the middle. --- ETFs really changed the game, not something we small investors can control.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin