2026-01-03 01:31:00

I've always wondered, why is it so difficult to succeed with on-chain options trading? Over the past few years, I've tried many projects, and they've all raised significant funding, with new protocols emerging constantly. But what’s the result? They crash as soon as they go live, trading volumes are dismal, and funds go down the drain. I've heard that just in this area alone, there are dozens of failed projects. It seems like a straightforward concept—why is it so hard to survive on-chain? I don't know if it's due to technical barriers or if the market capacity itself is the problem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-c799715c

· 01-05 14:53

Bro, you asked a good question. On-chain options, to put it simply, are a hot topic built on false demand. Once a wave of capital engulfs it, it dissipates.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 01-05 12:36

Basically, everyone wants to copy CEX's options model, but on-chain it's just not the same thing at all.

View OriginalReply0

UncommonNPC

· 01-04 04:36

Basically, it's a false demand. No matter how aggressively the financing party promotes it, on-chain options don't have that much real trading volume.

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 01-03 01:59

In simple terms, no one can overcome the liquidity hurdle. Based on historical data, the depth required by the options market is ten times that of the spot market. The on-chain cost structure simply cannot support such spreads; this is a dilemma that even macroeconomics cannot explain. All the T traders are dead, and you still want to rely on protocol innovation to save the day? My quantitative model has long marked this area as a high-risk black hole. It's basically an IQ tax driven by financing; just look at those PPT projects to understand. The problem isn't technical; it's that there isn't enough retail frenzy to fill this gap.

View OriginalReply0

MagicBean