2026-01-03 01:25:22

To determine whether an analyst truly has technical skills, the core focus is actually quite simple—the accuracy of support and resistance levels.

Taking the market on December 31st as an example. At that time, the key levels we identified were: BTC at 90800 to 91100 as resistance, Ethereum's 3150 as a critical resistance, a support around 87600 for Bitcoin, and SOL at the 123.8 support level. How did these levels perform afterward? Retail traders can review their own trading records and compare whether the market's reactions precisely responded to these points.

The market is filled with too many naive trading logic—like "rising during the day,必跌 at night."

BTC-3,55%

ETH-3,7%

SOL-3,45%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockTalk

· 01-06 01:00

I looked through the trading records, and your points are indeed very accurate, especially the 87,600 support level. That's exactly where I was bottom-fishing.

View OriginalReply0

SerNgmi

· 01-04 09:04

Damn, that's spot on. It all depends on whether the levels are accurate or not. No matter how much nonsense you talk, it’s useless.

View OriginalReply0

GreenCandleCollector

· 01-04 02:51

I checked the trading records, and the support level at 87,600 really didn't deceive, but 91,100 is a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketTeam

· 01-03 17:57

Haha, this is exactly what our Rockets team has been saying—the technical analysis is the real navigation system. I checked the trading records, and that 91100 move was indeed incredibly precise, it feels like you guys are trading with satellite positioning. Those comments like "rising during the day and必跌 at night" give me a headache; what era are we in still using this kind of logic? Support and resistance levels are essentially the accumulation points for betting chips; those who can't read this have long been educated by the market. How many backtests are needed to achieve such precise levels? But honestly, it's much more reliable than most people's wild guesses. That's why I keep saying DYOR—only by comparing your own analysis can you see clearly who is just blowing smoke.

View OriginalReply0

digital_archaeologist

· 01-03 01:55

Damn, this guy's level is really something. I actually bottomed out around 87,600 on December 31st, and it really rebounded.

View OriginalReply0

Hash_Bandit

· 01-03 01:53

ngl the support/resistance game is where the wheat gets separated from the chaff... 90800-91100 on btc? been watching those levels like a hawk myself. if your calls actually held up against real price action then yeah, respect the grind. too many analysts out there just throwing darts blindfolded tbh... that "day pump night dump" crowd kills me lmao

Reply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 01-03 01:45

Damn, these levels are really accurate in hindsight... I was already bottoming out at 87600 for that support, but whether I made money or not is another matter, haha. I'm really annoyed by those people who say "it rises during the day and must fall at night," they say that every day. It's more practical to focus on support and resistance levels.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-44a00d6c

· 01-03 01:45

Wow, this level is really amazing. I followed this setup on December 31st, and I really invested 87,600. I thought it was just a coincidence.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant