2026-01-02 07:25:04

The perpetual contract track is becoming increasingly competitive. Hyperliquid and Lighter are neck and neck in trading volume, whether in the past 24 hours or the last 30 days, both are in a close contest.

From user experience, liquidity depth, to fee structure, each platform is vying for dominance. But in the long run, who can stand out? The challenge behind this is not only the number of trading pairs and UI design but also risk control capabilities, ecosystem connectivity, and the ability to continuously innovate product forms.

In the current market conditions, the competition among perpetual trading platforms has shifted from simply competing for trading volume to competing for ecosystem integration capabilities. Which one do you think has more potential to go further?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TaxEvader

· 14h ago

Honestly, no matter how fierce these two fight, it's pointless. In the end, it still depends on who can retain the users' hearts. Wait, is Lighter's risk control really effective? I heard about liquidation events before. Ecosystem integration? Forget it, it still comes down to whether trading fees can be lower. That's the real key. Hyperliquid is a bit overhyped right now, I feel.

View OriginalReply0

SelfRugger

· 15h ago

It's a mess. To be honest, both companies are overextending their innovation space, and in the end, it's still a battle of capital and ecosystem relationships.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant

· 15h ago

To be honest, with these two fighting so fiercely now, I find it a bit hard to see clearly. Hyperliquid's ecosystem is indeed expanding rapidly, but Lighter's risk control feels more stable... who will ultimately win?

View OriginalReply0

RugpullAlertOfficer

· 15h ago

Just go ahead and compete; in the end, it all depends on who dares to truly implement risk control. --- Hyperliquid's ecosystem is indeed expanding rapidly, but I still trust Lighter's liquidation mechanism a bit more. --- Stop bragging; let's see who survives the next big crash. --- Honestly, it's still about risk control + user stickiness. The trading volume data can be easily faked. --- Ecosystem integration? Laughable. Most projects end up as casinos in the end. --- Actually, I prefer those who dare to lower fees, genuinely offering benefits to users. --- Lighter has indeed put effort into liquidity; Hyperliquid is just riding the trend. --- Risk control capability is crucial; a single black swan event can be deadly. --- To be honest, I've used both platforms; the experience isn't that different, it all depends on who doesn't rug pull. --- Perpetual contracts will eventually go through a shakeout; today's prosperity is only temporary.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-3824aa38

· 15h ago

Getting completely exhausted is normal. When two sides fight fiercely, it indicates there are still opportunities in the track. But I believe that the ones who truly survive will be the ones who can build a solid ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainSniper

· 15h ago

Honestly, Hyperliquid's risk control is more detailed, and Lighter offers a smoother user experience but is more prone to liquidation. In terms of ecosystem integration, they are quite similar; the key is who can withstand the black swan event. The perpetual track has become so competitive that there's no room to maneuver. Now it's a race to see who lasts longer. Hyperliquid probably won't last long; I bet Lighter will win. Users have long seen through the fee structure; it's still about the underlying stability. Neither of them is good enough; let's wait and see who the next disruptor is. Lighter's liquidity depth is actually a bit superficial; good data doesn't mean much. Risk control? Ha, when the market turns, it's all useless.

View OriginalReply0

DeadTrades_Walking

· 15h ago

Competing fiercely and dying in the process, ultimately it's all about liquidity. Hyperliquid is relying on its existing assets, Lighter is trying to innovate, but the real competition is whose risk control doesn't fail. Everyone's going to die. Ecosystem? Uh... what's there to connect in this track's ecosystem? It's still the harvest season.

View OriginalReply0