Here's the thing with $MSTR—the thesis holds up if two conditions stick around: their access to the common ATM doesn't dry up, and Bitcoin keeps that roughly 30% yearly growth trajectory. Strip away the noise and the math actually works out. You're looking at a play where the fundamentals track Bitcoin's performance while maintaining the financing flexibility to scale. Not complicated, just straightforward mechanics that make sense on paper.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CodeSmellHunter
· 7h ago
Bro, why do I feel like this logic is a bit fragile? Do both conditions have to be stuck at the same time?
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911
· 7h ago
Honestly, a 30% annual growth rate is too unrealistic. Can BTC really keep rising like this... No matter how perfect the theoretical logic looks on paper, it can't withstand reality.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 7h ago
To be honest, MSTR's logic relies on two conditions, and both are indispensable.
Here's the thing with $MSTR—the thesis holds up if two conditions stick around: their access to the common ATM doesn't dry up, and Bitcoin keeps that roughly 30% yearly growth trajectory. Strip away the noise and the math actually works out. You're looking at a play where the fundamentals track Bitcoin's performance while maintaining the financing flexibility to scale. Not complicated, just straightforward mechanics that make sense on paper.