Lighter recently announced the launch of an ecosystem incentive token, LIT, issued directly by a US C-Corp. The interesting aspect of this design is moving the revenue mechanism on-chain — the income generated from DEX and subsequent products is traceable, and can be flexibly used for growth or buybacks depending on market conditions. It seems aimed at building a more transparent value cycle. The token distribution follows a common 50-50 model, with half allocated to ecosystem development and the other half distributed to the team and investors. By the end of the 2025 points season, the accumulated points have reached a significant scale. The key to this structure is whether it can truly create a positive feedback loop between exchange revenue and token value, thereby generating long-term benefits for participants.

LIT-10,14%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshivip
· 01-01 04:17
The concept of bringing income onto the blockchain is indeed innovative, but how many can truly be implemented? The key still depends on whether this positive feedback loop can be sustained in the future.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationKingvip
· 2025-12-30 08:51
On-chain transparency sounds great, but how many can actually implement it? No matter how crazy the points season gets, without real income support, it's still a paper tiger.
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObservervip
· 2025-12-30 08:50
Transparency of income on the blockchain sounds good, but how many can actually be realized? It still depends on whether the subsequent trading volume can keep up.
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokesvip
· 2025-12-30 08:41
Uh... a 50-50 split sounds fair, but I'm still a bit worried. Can it really create positive feedback? It feels like on-chain transparency is just surface-level talk.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin