A leading asset management firm’s investment chief Matt Hougan recently shared his views, believing that the performance trajectory of Bitcoin over the next decade will differ from the early days of rapid doubling and wild swings. In the new cycle, Bitcoin is more likely to exhibit a "long-term steady rise" pattern.



His logic is clear: as market participants become more professional and institutional funds gradually become mainstream, the nature of the entire market is changing. The era of sudden surges and crashes is coming to an end, replaced by a low-volatility, more predictable growth model — in his words, "high-quality returns, but not dramatic."

Looking at the price trend, Bitcoin reached a historical high of $125,100 in October last year, then retraced to around $87,800, with nearly a 4% decline over the past 30 days. This drop may seem significant, but Matt Hougan believes there’s no need for excessive pessimism. He points out that this correction mainly results from retail investors taking profits following a four-year cycle pattern, rather than fundamental issues. Compared to historical declines of over 60%, the current adjustment is quite restrained, which actually indicates that institutional long-term capital continues to flow in, providing a bottom support for the market. Based on this judgment, he remains bullish through 2026.

However, internal market disagreements are indeed widening. Some analysts are focusing on the timing structure of the October high, noting that this level resembles the cyclical features of previous market tops, leading to the inference that Bitcoin might weaken in 2026. Some veteran traders even estimate that Bitcoin could bottom out around $60,000 in Q3 2026.

From a broader macro perspective, the crypto market is undergoing a transformation. The era once dominated by retail investors and short-term speculation, characterized by frequent high volatility, is being replaced by a rationalized long-cycle competition driven by institutional funds. This shift has not only reduced volatility but also changed how investors manage expectations.

Currently, at the beginning of January, market enthusiasm varies. But regardless of short-term fluctuations, for long-term participants, sufficient understanding and confidence are often more important than chasing every rise and fall. The degree of institutional involvement in this cycle is unprecedented, and the market structure is being redefined.
BTC2,12%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForkMastervip
· 2025-12-31 11:17
Institutions entering the market can ensure stability? I heard that some top players are also secretly cashing out. --- Steadily rising sounds comfortable, but I can't wait ten years for my three kids' formula money. --- I've looked at the bottom estimate of 60,000, but it feels a bit off compared to the data in the last bear market survival guide. --- Low volatility and high quality, to put it nicely, just means slower profit growth. --- Institutional funds keep flowing in? Then why is the spread in arbitrage between forks narrowing? Isn't that someone quietly exiting? --- From the perspective of a betting agreement, 60,000 is indeed a support level, but who dares to bet on it? --- I've heard this kind of analysis too many times. Every time they say institutions are stable, but in the end? The project teams are still playing them around.
View OriginalReply0
FastLeavervip
· 2025-12-31 10:15
Institutional entry is just diluting the crypto market; the thrill of a 10x surge before is gone. Talking about long-term steady growth sounds like just putting money in a fixed deposit... If I had to choose, I still prefer that crazy feeling. How does Matt always manage to brainwash retail investors? A 4% drop is called a correction? What kind of storms have we been through before? Wait, do you really think 2026 will hit a bottom at 60,000? I’m starting to believe it... Instead of listening to these big shots’ judgments, it’s better to do it yourself, since it’s all just guesswork anyway.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemesvip
· 2025-12-28 12:55
Steady growth sounds good, but I still want to see that crazy doubling joy. Institutional entry is just the beginning of trapping retail investors; think about it from the other side. A 4% drop, so what? The real panic hasn't even started yet. Always promoting long-term holding, I'm tired of hearing that line. 60,000 yuan as the threshold? Then I better save up money carefully. So, does that mean Bitcoin will become a bond in the future? Is this still called investing? Are institutions really buying or just selling off? Who knows? No matter how rational the change, it can't alter the fact that I lost money.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractRebelvip
· 2025-12-28 12:54
Steady rise? Just listen, the cyclical features of the historical top are right there. --- Here we go again, the story of institutions taking over... Retail investors should probably run now. --- I remember that 60,000 line. See you then. --- High-quality returns are not dramatic; it sounds like a polite way of saying there's no profit opportunity. --- Institutional entry = volatility decreases? That doesn't seem right; this logic is reversed. --- Ten years of steady growth, I just ask who actually believes it. --- Interesting, both sides have data to support their views, but no one can say for sure how 2026 will unfold. --- Cognition and confidence? Without a price increase, there's really no confidence. --- The bottom support argument—every coin that said this before has fallen through.
View OriginalReply0
DuskSurfervip
· 2025-12-28 12:52
Another argument that "institutions entering the market will lead to steady growth," sounds good, but isn't it just to get us to take the fall? --- Steady rise? Then why do we still have to follow retail investor cycles? This logic is a bit tangled. --- I remember the $60,000 mark. Let's see whose prediction turns out to be more accurate later. --- Does institutional capital entering the market mean more rationality? I don't think so; wealthy people also cut leeks without hesitation. --- In plain terms, the volatility has decreased, and the opportunities to make money have also disappeared. For retail investors, isn't that bad news? --- Long-term bullish statements are heard too often; it's better to hold your coins and wait and see. --- So the current question is, who can outperform this "new cycle"? --- If it's not dramatic, then there's no opportunity, right? How are small retail investors like us supposed to survive?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 2025-12-28 12:50
Long-term steady rise? Wake up, retail investors are still being harvested. --- Matt Hougan's rhetoric sounds comfortable but I don't believe it; when institutions step in, retail investors should run. --- $60,000 bottom? Ha, if it really drops to that level, I'll go all in. --- "High-quality returns are not dramatic," in plain words, it means there's no chance to get rich overnight. --- Institutional funds providing bottom support? I haven't seen that, only my principal supporting itself. --- Bullish in 2026? Let's survive 2025 first. --- The so-called transformation sounds good, but in reality, it's just the main players changing their way of cutting. --- Those who entered at the beginning of January are all cannon fodder; don't listen to these big shots' inspirational quotes.
View OriginalReply0
BakedCatFanboyvip
· 2025-12-28 12:39
Institutional entry has indeed "tamed" the market; the thrill of a 50% increase in April is gone, and now that it's steadily rising, it's quite boring... But on the other hand, that prediction of a dip to 60000 sounds a bit scary, hope it doesn't actually come true.
View OriginalReply0
HashBanditvip
· 2025-12-28 12:32
nah bro, back in my mining days we'd see 300% swings in a week lol... now everyone's talking about "quality returns" like we're managing a 401k or smth 💀 institutions really did flatten the fun out of this market fr
Reply0
HappyToBeDumpedvip
· 2025-12-28 12:31
Institutions entering the market will stabilize it? I still find this logic a bit questionable... Retail investors cut losses while institutions accumulate, does anyone not know who profits and who loses?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin