2025-12-28 12:21:23

Infinex Official Announces that the INX Token Sale Registration Process Has Started. This is a key opportunity for investors to participate in the project.

According to the latest schedule, the token sale will take place from January 3 to 6 over four days, hosted on the Sonar platform. This round of funding releases 5% of the total INX supply, with the project team setting the fully diluted valuation (FDV) at $99.99 million.

For investors, several important details are worth noting: the investment amount has a minimum and maximum limit, with a minimum of $200 and a maximum of $2,500. Allocation will be done through a random mechanism, but participants may have the chance to receive bonuses under certain conditions. Additionally, tokens purchased will need to be locked for one year, but the project offers an early unlock option, providing some flexibility.

If you're interested in this project, the registration channel is now open, and investors can prepare in advance.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CommunitySlacker

· 2025-12-30 12:23

It's another random allocation... I've seen this trick too many times, and only a few people actually get selected. Sales start on January 3rd, which is way too rushed. You can only move your tokens after locking them for a year, so it's hard to say whether the coins will still be valuable then. Just based on the FDV of 99.99 million, it feels a bit fake. Is the $2,500 cap meant to support the market?

View OriginalReply0

ChainWanderingPoet

· 2025-12-28 12:50

Wow, a valuation of 99.99 million is quite particular, implying a perfect score? Locking for a year is a bit harsh. Wait, random allocation? Isn't that just a gamble based on luck? From 200 to 2500, it feels like another way to squeeze retail investors. The first rule of position management is don't go all in, everyone. Is the Sonar platform reliable? Honestly, I've never heard of it. At the beginning of the month, money will be moving again, and the wallet is about to cry. This kind of sales scale feels somewhat lukewarm.

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 2025-12-28 12:50

Hmm... another random allocation. I've played this trick too many times. Lockup for a year? Forget it, I'll just watch. The $2500 cap is a bit stingy. I really want to invest, but I can't go all out.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSqueezer

· 2025-12-28 12:42

Haha, is it that time of year again—"All In" moment? Locking for a year... never mind, I'll wait and see. 200 to 2500? That's a tight range. A project with a FDV of only 99.99 million... I dare not touch it. Sonar is doing another random distribution. The insider says they can't understand it. Before January 3rd, I rushed in. Anyone want to join? These are all gambling, to be honest. Here it comes again—tempting early-stage funding rounds. What are the conditions for early unlock? That's where the trap is. INX... never heard of it. Will it really take off?

View OriginalReply0

MoodFollowsPrice

· 2025-12-28 12:41

Locking for a year? How long do I have to gamble? It feels a bit painful.

View OriginalReply0

TxFailed

· 2025-12-28 12:30

ngl the 1-year lockup is lowkey a red flag... literally learned this the hard way with three other projects lmaooo

Reply0

potentially_notable

· 2025-12-28 12:21

Damn, locking for a year? That's way too harsh. It's also a random mechanism, feels no different from gambling. The 200-2500 limit setup... interesting, the threshold is quite friendly. FDV is only over 90 million? Isn't this valuation a bit low? Is the Sonar platform reliable? Has anyone participated? Started in early January, better register quickly. 5% of the supply released, the basic market is quite stable. The early unlock option saved me, otherwise I would have been really screwed.

View OriginalReply0