2025-12-27 16:26:32

Lighter's recent actions in handling the witch accounts seem to be quite targeted. It's clear that the focus is on those large-scale players, and the logic behind this is not hard to understand — after all, the project team previously promised that "issued points will not be reclaimed." Violating this promise to clean up witch accounts indicates that they are more concerned with the token price performance and the project's long-term development.

I was also affected, but honestly, after observing the entire process, I feel more confident. The project team’s ability to make such trade-offs between promises and reality shows that they are serious about the project's ecosystem planning. This kind of boldness and vision is precisely why it's worth continuing to bet on.

LIT-5,05%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
9
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

FUD_Vaccinated

· 2025-12-30 13:54

Hmm... that’s a slap in the face. Promising not to retract the results and then still taking action—this is called "trade-off decision-making"? It sounds more like the project team blatantly breaking their promises.

But on the other hand, being cleared is also cleared. Instead of getting angry, it’s better to see if they can really improve the project in the future... that’s the only salvation.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFreedom

· 2025-12-30 06:50

Damn, the people who got wiped out probably need to think it through. This is the attitude of the project team.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSourGrape

· 2025-12-29 19:58

Damn, is this article hyping up Lighter? If I wasn't affected, I'd be applauding right now...

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingersFOMO

· 2025-12-29 16:57

I was also cleared out, but to be honest, I now have more confidence in Lighter. The move to target big players definitely takes guts.

View OriginalReply0

GasSavingMaster

· 2025-12-27 16:54

Well... to be honest, I'm a bit conflicted. Using the banner of a cleansing witch to cut off big players—this tactic is indeed quite ruthless.

It seems that the project team just wants the token price to look good. Whatever promises they made before, they can just change their tune, right?

But on the other hand, daring to do this shows they genuinely want to operate long-term, not some cowardly project.

I was also cleared out, but then I thought... never mind, this is just the cost of the ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 2025-12-27 16:46

Oh no, even after being cleared, I still keep going. This is called faith... But to be honest, the project team's move this time was quite ruthless. I just don't know if they'll come back with another wave later on.

View OriginalReply0

CounterIndicator

· 2025-12-27 16:41

Ha, this round of cleanup operations really seems to have disturbed quite a few people's interests.

To be honest, the project team played their hand quite ruthlessly. Dare to argue between promises and reality, either they are truly confident or they are cornered... But from the results, it seems they are indeed sending signals?

The major players affected probably have some idea in their minds. This scale is bigger than expected.

View OriginalReply0

PonziDetector

· 2025-12-27 16:36

Haha, that's right. Lighter really went all out this time, with such obvious selective strikes... Speaking of which, I have to admit that the project's willingness to break their promises to maintain the ecosystem shows a certain vision.

But I still have some doubts. If the project team can change their stance today for the sake of the token price, what about tomorrow? Can we really trust this kind of "flexibility and adaptability"?

View OriginalReply0

MidsommarWallet

· 2025-12-27 16:28

To be honest, I was pretty upset when I was wiped out, but on second thought... the project team’s move definitely shows their vision. Dare to violate the promise and cut the Witches, which indicates they are truly considering the ecosystem, not just saying nice words and calling it a day. The long-term price movement of the coin still depends on this.

View OriginalReply0