There are really still platforms willing to invest money in AI trading competitions, which is rare. Check out the competitions on the market, most of them stay at backtesting and demo trading; no matter how beautiful the stories are, they are just armchair strategies and offer little help to those truly developing trading strategies.

Recently, a leading platform hosted a hackathon that was different. Just by looking at their reward structure, you can see the clue—this is not just a marketing stunt to generate buzz, but a serious effort to find AI trading strategies that can actually run in live markets. From the design of the reward structure, you can feel that the platform is selecting for practical trading ability, not just flashy backtest results. This kind of positioning is what makes the entire ecosystem interesting.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

MidnightGenesis

· 2025-12-29 06:33

On-chain data shows that the recent reward contract deployment indeed has anomalies. Notably, the fund flow is completely different from previous marketing activities.

View OriginalReply0

ForkInTheRoad

· 2025-12-28 07:55

Backtest data is all lies, I'm tired of seeing it. Only real trading accounts count.

Platforms that dare to invest real money in this kind of thing are indeed rare; most are still playing with virtual funds.

Wait, are they really running strategies with real trading accounts? Now that's what I want to see.

Anyone can tell stories, but making money is the real skill. Backtesting is outdated and should have been eliminated long ago.

How is the reward structure designed? Can you share it? I'm a bit tempted.

Another marketing gimmick, let's see how it performs in actual trading.

Only competitions like this are worth participating in; no wasting time messing around on demo accounts.

Well said, the ecosystem needs such screening mechanisms to eliminate junk.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 2025-12-26 12:50

Backtest data is all Photoshop; only real money shows people's true intentions.

View OriginalReply0

ContractTester

· 2025-12-26 12:41

Real trading ability is the true skill; those who only boast about backtesting are truly unimpressive.

After looking at the reward plan, I can tell they're not fooling around this time. The serious attitude is palpable.

Backtest data looks good, but what's the use? The market can wipe out those gains in a single wave. Ultimately, real money talks.

This kind of competition is worthy of being called a real event; all the others are just pure IQ tax.

Finally, I see a platform that wants to do something meaningful.

View OriginalReply0

SocialAnxietyStaker

· 2025-12-26 12:26

Finally, someone dares to trade with real funds. I really couldn't laugh at those simulated trading competitions before.

Backtest data looks good, but making money is the real goal.

This platform is serious about it, and the reward setup shows they genuinely want strategies, not just hype.

Real trading is the true test; how many days of backtesting are useless in front of the real market, leading to complete failure.

View OriginalReply0