On December 26th, U.S. President Trump issued a statement stating that the U.S. military, under his direct orders, carried out multiple precision strikes against extremist targets in northwestern Nigeria on the evening of December 25th local time, using the term "powerful and deadly." Trump pointed out that the region has long suffered from violent threats from extremist militants, with significant civilian casualties. This operation was directly executed by the U.S. military.



After this news was announced, many traders began to reflect: Is there a certain correlation between the rising geopolitical tensions and the recent weakness in the crypto markets?

From a macro perspective, geopolitical conflicts often trigger several chain reactions. First, risk aversion tends to increase, with traditional funds possibly flowing into government bonds or gold and other safe-haven assets. Second, military actions may cause fluctuations in international financial markets, which can spill over into risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. Furthermore, if the conflict escalates, it could disrupt global trade order, indirectly affecting risk appetite.

However, it should be noted that the movement of the crypto market is influenced by multiple factors—such as Federal Reserve policy expectations, liquidity conditions, and institutional positioning—that are often more direct drivers. While a single geopolitical event can cause short-term volatility, the medium- to long-term trend still depends on macroeconomic fundamentals. The current performance of BTC and ETH may more reflect the overall adjustment cycle of risk assets rather than the direct consequences of a specific event.

It is worth continuously monitoring how such events evolve and their actual impact on global liquidity.
BTC-4,14%
ETH-4,54%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BankruptWorkervip
· 2025-12-29 03:24
They're starting to blame geopolitical issues again. Honestly, I think the Federal Reserve hasn't really loosened monetary policy yet, so stop talking nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemesvip
· 2025-12-28 01:14
Another excuse to shift blame to geopolitical issues. Wake up, everyone. Is this the reason for the decline?
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeachervip
· 2025-12-27 12:28
Blaming geopolitical situations again? I think it's still the Federal Reserve's business, don't overcomplicate it.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaservip
· 2025-12-26 04:48
Blaming geopolitical situations again? Honestly, it's still the Federal Reserve's issue.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightningvip
· 2025-12-26 04:45
Geopolitical conflicts are happening again, but to be honest, the continuous decline in the crypto market has long been the norm. Blaming Trump for this is a bit of a stretch.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomadvip
· 2025-12-26 04:38
Blaming geopolitical issues again? Wake up, it's still the Federal Reserve's business.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStakervip
· 2025-12-26 04:31
The geopolitical situation is changing wave after wave, and the crypto community is also being repeatedly squeezed... It's all the Federal Reserve's fault, really.
View OriginalReply0
4am_degenvip
· 2025-12-26 04:29
Geopolitical conflicts are just an excuse. Honestly, it's still the Fed's bunch of issues causing this. The crypto circle is quick to shift blame.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776vip
· 2025-12-26 04:27
Once again, the geopolitical situation is being used as a scapegoat. Do you really think Bitcoin will obediently listen to Trump? Wake up, this is the classic "Schrödinger's Bull Market"—a crisis moment that is both a safe-haven asset and a risky asset, and it can be justified either way.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin