In the stablecoin ecosystem, the differences in compliance enforcement are much greater than you might imagine.
According to blockchain data analysis, between 2023 and 2025, Tether and Circle have taken completely different approaches to asset freezing. Tether has been very aggressive—freezing a total of $33 billion in crypto assets, with over 7,200 blacklisted addresses, of which more than 2,800 are in cooperation with US law enforcement agencies. This scale alone is already quite shocking.
What’s even more interesting is Tether’s operational logic. They don’t simply freeze assets and stop there, but adopt a complete mechanism of "freeze + destroy + reissue" to recover funds involved in scams and illegal activities. Data shows that over half of the frozen USDT are on the Tron network.
Circle’s approach is much more cautious. They only act when there is a court ruling or clear regulatory requirement, freezing 372 addresses and involving $109 million between 2023 and 2025. When comparing both sides, the gap reaches about 30 times. Circle has not yet taken measures such as token destruction or reissuance.
From this comparison, it’s clear that the two stablecoin issuers have different understandings and implementations of compliance—one is proactive, the other is reactive.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleMinion
· 8h ago
Tether's move is really bold, freezing 33 billion directly. No one has that kind of guts... Circle is too conservative, seems like they're waiting to be regulated and squeezed.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropGrandpa
· 12h ago
Tether's move is really ruthless, freezing $33 billion directly, while Circle seems to be dozing off.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainWorker
· 12h ago
The freezing of 33 billion USDT is truly impressive; Circle's cautious approach is also astonishing.
View OriginalReply0
UncleWhale
· 12h ago
The $33 billion freeze scale of Tether is truly outrageous. Circle has been completely crushed; being 30 times smaller is no joke.
View OriginalReply0
NFTPessimist
· 12h ago
USDT really treats regulation as a business, and Circle, being so conservative, how does it feel like they're digging their own grave?
View OriginalReply0
ForkMonger
· 12h ago
lol tether really went full authoritarian mode huh... 330B frozen, that's basically playing central bank now. not sure if that's "compliance" or just governance theater tbh
Reply0
DecentralizedElder
· 12h ago
USDT this move, 33 billion directly frozen, truly ruthless
This 30-fold difference is a bit outrageous, Circle's conservative approach is indeed stable
Is Tron the one with the most freezes? We need to take a good look at who has been frozen
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 12h ago
Tether's aggressive approach is a bit scary, with a freeze amount of 33 billion... It seems that a conservative route like Circle's might actually be more reliable.
In the stablecoin ecosystem, the differences in compliance enforcement are much greater than you might imagine.
According to blockchain data analysis, between 2023 and 2025, Tether and Circle have taken completely different approaches to asset freezing. Tether has been very aggressive—freezing a total of $33 billion in crypto assets, with over 7,200 blacklisted addresses, of which more than 2,800 are in cooperation with US law enforcement agencies. This scale alone is already quite shocking.
What’s even more interesting is Tether’s operational logic. They don’t simply freeze assets and stop there, but adopt a complete mechanism of "freeze + destroy + reissue" to recover funds involved in scams and illegal activities. Data shows that over half of the frozen USDT are on the Tron network.
Circle’s approach is much more cautious. They only act when there is a court ruling or clear regulatory requirement, freezing 372 addresses and involving $109 million between 2023 and 2025. When comparing both sides, the gap reaches about 30 times. Circle has not yet taken measures such as token destruction or reissuance.
From this comparison, it’s clear that the two stablecoin issuers have different understandings and implementations of compliance—one is proactive, the other is reactive.