2025-12-13 22:10:09

#加密生态动态追踪 Looking at this market trend, which capital is causing the trouble😂? The price has been steady and stable, and suddenly it was hammered down. After seeing this kind of pattern many times, when the big players move their chips, retail investors suffer. With such a sharp, cliff-like decline in the trend, there must be someone behind the scenes manipulating it.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MelonField

· 2025-12-16 19:19

Here we go again, who will take the buy-in during this sell-off?

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentTherapist

· 2025-12-15 20:29

Here we go again, this wave of dumping really treating retail investors like leeks to be harvested.

View OriginalReply0

FarmToRiches

· 2025-12-14 12:59

It's the same old story; I've seen through it long ago.

View OriginalReply0

MEV_Whisperer

· 2025-12-13 22:40

Coming with the same tricks again? The old game of big players accumulating funds.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 2025-12-13 22:37

It's so obvious that the market is being manipulated downward; the stop-loss has already been triggered. The profits that should have been taken have already been earned.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 2025-12-13 22:37

It's the same trick again... I need to check the on-chain transfer records. There must be whale addresses that recently moved. That's why I said the sharp sell-off is so orderly—there's definitely an institutional address behind the scenes manipulating it.

View OriginalReply0

SudoRm-RfWallet/

· 2025-12-13 22:31

Here we go again. Who the hell can withstand this wave of dumping?

View OriginalReply0

SolidityNewbie

· 2025-12-13 22:18

Big whales dumping, and us retail investors are just the ones getting shaken out.

View OriginalReply0