2025-12-10 09:26:09

Breaking news just dropped from the SEC's new leadership. Chair Paul Atkins made a striking statement that could reshape how we think about token regulation. His position? ICOs and network tokens shouldn't fall under securities classification—meaning they're actually beyond the SEC's regulatory scope.

What makes this even more interesting is his follow-up comment: "That's what we want to encourage." This isn't just legal hairsplitting. It signals a potential policy shift toward fostering innovation rather than applying blanket securities laws to every token launch.

For projects that have been navigating murky regulatory waters, this could be a game-changer. The implications for how networks structure their token launches, how exchanges list assets, and how developers approach compliance might all be on the table for reconsideration.

The timing matters too. With crypto regulation being such a hot-button issue, having the SEC chair explicitly draw boundaries on what falls outside their jurisdiction gives the industry something it's desperately needed—clarity.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 2025-12-13 06:03

Holy crap, is this for real? Is Atkins about to cut us some slack? Wait, the SEC is no longer in charge of ICOs? Then who is... Feels like another prelude to another round of rug pulls. Finally some clarity. The previous securities law tactics really confused everyone. If this is true, the folks at the exchanges will probably be popping champagne. Sounds great, but I still find it hard to believe. They always just talk like this. This is proper regulation, not a ban. Feels like the industry is saved? Another pre-emptive hype before a positive development, believe it or not, I believe it. Suddenly changing tactics, I need to carefully check the small print so I don’t get fleeced again.

View OriginalReply0

ForkItAll

· 2025-12-12 19:53

Really? Atkinson directly said that ICOs are not under SEC regulation this time? Why do I feel like he's hinting at something... Wait, "encourage innovation"? Bro, are you giving the green light to copycat coins? LOL It should have been like this a long time ago, anyway everything is a mess now. Sudden change of tone depends on the follow-up, don’t get excited just based on one sentence. I believe the last sentence — at least being clear is better than playing word games every day. Now those lawyers might be unemployed. Regulatory clarity? Uh... I still have some doubts. But on the other hand, this could really change a lot of things.

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 2025-12-10 23:29

Wait, Atkin's, is this really true? The token is directly outside the SEC's jurisdiction? That’s a bit too good to be true. What a scam, why did nobody believe that previous explanation? If that's really the case, TON and other projects would be laughing their heads off. Speaking of which, the clarity came too late... I don’t quite believe it; it’s probably another misinterpretation from some source. Now the regulatory agencies are probably competing even more fiercely.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHustler

· 2025-12-10 09:56

Hey, finally someone dares to tell the truth. This move has directly broken a standoff that lasted for years. --- Wait, is this real or is there another twist? I've seen the SEC's tricks many times. --- No way, are tokens finally going to be loosened? Those old projects might be saved. --- Clarity? Haha, I think it's just a trap set for everyone. --- Paul, this guy is pretty good. Finally, there's someone sensible hosting. --- But speaking of which, should exchanges change their rules now? --- Damn, if this really happens, those dusty tokens might still have a chance. --- It's the same old rhetoric. Believe me, policies can change in a heartbeat. --- The industry needs this kind of attitude. Don't treat every coin as a pest. --- It was about time. Regulation and innovation are really not always mortal enemies.

View OriginalReply0

GhostChainLoyalist

· 2025-12-10 09:53

Whoa, this move directly loosened the SEC's chain. Finally, someone dares to tell the truth. Wait, is this real? Feels like a dream. Tokens are not considered securities... So the projects I was scared by the SEC before should be panicking now, haha. Clarity? I think they just issued a free pass for innovators. Basically, it's giving the crypto community a breathing room, this move is indeed fierce. Atkins' words might be more valuable than any policy document. But to be safe, we still need to see how it is implemented later; lip service is the most unreliable. Finally, someone is giving the industry a green light, this wave of momentum is on point.

View OriginalReply0

DYORMaster

· 2025-12-10 09:50

Damn, Atkin's moves this time are pretty ruthless... Are tokens really about to break free from the SEC's claws? Wait, is this really not just a hype hallucination? It feels too surreal. Bull market signals are at their strongest, now project teams can finally sleep peacefully haha. Finally, someone clarified it. It’s ridiculous to apply securities laws to tokens like that before. But still, DYOR (Do Your Own Research), don’t get carried away by a single statement. We need to see how it’s actually implemented moving forward. This clarity is really what the industry has been missing, damn, it’s finally here. The path to compliance has suddenly become clear. Feels like the next wave of technological innovation is about to take off?

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 2025-12-10 09:43

Damn, Atkinsons really went all out this time, with ICOs and online tokens directly out of SEC jurisdiction? This is the pace of letting loose, only with relaxed regulations can innovation truly take off. But honestly, after this positive news, we’ll have to see how it’s implemented later. It’s easy to say nicely, but policy enforcement is the key; don’t let it turn into just talk on paper again. F***, if this is real, then those projects that were crazily scrutinized before would be wasted, but now it looks like a bright new path has emerged. The industry has finally waited for this moment; clarity is desperately needed. Relying solely on guesses and assumptions about which protocols are safe is really exhausting. It feels like the compliance route will need to be re-planned. How many project teams will have to overhaul their plans this time? This guy’s one statement directly changed the game rules of the crypto ecosystem, truly an operation at the veteran level. If only the three regulators earlier had his level of awareness, they wouldn’t have pushed innovators to go abroad. Wait, does this mean those projects that were previously shut down have a chance to turn things around? Suddenly I remember, no matter how good the words are, we must be cautious of policies changing repeatedly later on. Regulation is just as unpredictable as coin prices.

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 2025-12-10 09:28

Wait, what is Atkins implying? Is ICO really going to get out of the SEC's hands? Sounds good, but I'll have to figure it out... Is this clarity really clear, or is it drawing a cake for us? Damn, if you really want to change it like this, how high those old projects are Now the road of compliance can finally see the light, but who dares to guarantee that the next term will not be reversed? Okay, trust him first and see how long he can last The SEC turned around a bit fast, wasn't it still chasing and fighting before? But then again, this is indeed a big benefit for the builders, and they finally don't have to tremble every day It's a bit interesting, the regulatory authorities take the initiative to make concessions, which is rare in the United States

View OriginalReply0