Last month, in the corner of a tech meetup, I seized an opportunity to chat with Kite’s founder, Chi Zhang, for quite a while. To be honest, the environment was pretty noisy—people everywhere discussing projects, the coffee machine whirring loudly. I asked him directly, “Everyone knows building an AI economic layer is a tough nut to crack, so why are you guys so determined to tackle it?”



His answer was pretty unexpected. He didn’t talk about changing the world or anything grand like that; instead, he brought up his previous experience working at Google Cloud and Snapchat. He said there’s an image he can’t forget—those world-class AI models, incredibly powerful, yet stuck waiting on servers for humans to give them commands. It’s like a bird that can fly, but is locked in a cage and never gets to take off.

That really made me understand. What brings together this group of Stanford and MIT graduates, along with core tech talent from Silicon Valley giants, isn’t chasing a hot trend for quick money—it’s about genuinely wanting to solve a fundamental problem: How can AI not only do tasks, but also make its own decisions and create value in the market independently?

From what I’ve observed, what’s most impressive about the Kite team is their ability to “mix and match.” They’re not just pure smart contract developers from the crypto world, nor are they academics locked in a lab writing papers—they’re more like “battle-tested architects” forged on the front lines of business.

Their CTO, Vibhav Bhargava, used to be responsible for large-scale systems at Meta, and that experience is absolutely critical. The whole team’s approach to design is grounded—they don’t start by theorizing about maximum throughput, but instead ask questions like, “During a big shopping event, how fast does an AI shopping assistant need to react to help a user snag a flash deal?” This way of working backward from real-world scenarios to define technical requirements is a totally different mindset from projects that just pile up numbers in their whitepapers.

This also explains why their testnet could handle 17 billion interactions and remain stable. It’s not luck—it’s that from day one, they designed with real user behavior and edge cases in mind.

Simply put, building economic infrastructure for AI requires more than just technical idealism; you need experience dealing with challenges in real business environments. The most valuable thing about the Kite team may just be this hybrid skill set—they understand both AI and business, can write code, and know user pain points.
KITE5,12%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
Layer2Arbitrageurvip
· 2025-12-12 17:36
so they stress-tested 17B interactions and didn't break? that's... actually not terrible, but let's be real – what's the actual gas consumption per txn under peak load? because throughput metrics are meaningless if you're bleeding money on calldata.
Reply0
RooftopVIPvip
· 2025-12-12 15:27
Ha, this is the real deal, not just a bunch of buzzwords piled together like in those whitepapers.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatchervip
· 2025-12-10 08:38
17 billion interactions are still stable, this number is a bit outrageous, is it really fake? However, people poached from big companies such as Google, Meta, and Snapchat are indeed much more reliable than simply speculating on concepts. It is this part of AI making decisions independently, how to supervise...
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweepervip
· 2025-12-09 19:21
17 billion interactions and still stable—now that’s real engineering expertise, not just empty boasting.
View OriginalReply0
SerNgmivip
· 2025-12-09 19:19
Still stable after 17 billion interactions? That number is a bit scary; it really doesn't feel like just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
fren.ethvip
· 2025-12-09 19:13
17 billion interactions and still stable—this number is pretty impressive. Has it been stress-tested in real business scenarios?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainUndercovervip
· 2025-12-09 19:02
Oh wow, now this is a team that genuinely wants to get things done, not just here to cash out on others.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalistvip
· 2025-12-09 18:58
honestly, the "caged bird" metaphor hits different when you realize most projects are just doing theater with tokenomics. kite's actually thinking about the stack architecture beneath the hype, which... yeah, separates the theorists from the people who've actually shipped at scale. meta experience shows.
Reply0
  • Pin