Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Another controversy is making the rounds in the crypto space: a trader named Elizabeth is being accused of faking position data. It’s said she edited screenshots of her holdings to create the appearance of profits. This kind of behavior isn’t uncommon in crypto, but every exposure sparks heated debate.
Some sleuths pointed out that images from her earlier trade posts showed signs of Photoshop, with contradictions in position amounts and ROI figures. Careful users also compared and found that for the same time period, the positions she posted across different platforms were completely different.
These tactics are often used to attract copy trading or drive referral commissions. Newcomers to crypto can be misled by flashy profit screenshots and end up losing money by following along. How should this be addressed? Do exchanges have a responsibility to vet the authenticity of these influencers (KOLs)?