2025-12-07 10:29:44

Just witnessed something interesting with a decentralized identity solution in action.

A governance application needed to verify user tier status. Instead of requesting full credential access, the system pulled exactly what was needed—just the governance tier component. Nothing more, nothing less.

This modular approach to identity verification shows how far we've come. Your credentials stay compartmentalized. Apps only see what they absolutely need to function. The rest remains private.

It's these small implementation details that reveal whether an identity protocol actually respects user sovereignty or just talks about it. Selective disclosure isn't a feature—it's the baseline standard we should expect from any serious Web3 identity infrastructure.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MidnightMEVeater

· 2025-12-10 07:11

Seeing this at 3 a.m., I suddenly remembered how many projects shouted privacy and actually stole your entire wallet address history. This is true selective disclosure, not the kind of marketing word that says "we respect privacy".

View OriginalReply0

Deconstructionist

· 2025-12-09 14:08

Selective disclosure sounds nice, but there are very few protocols that can actually achieve it... Most are still just playing with the concept.

View OriginalReply0

ChainProspector

· 2025-12-07 10:56

Alright, finally a project that really understands privacy—not just paying lip service.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTherapist

· 2025-12-07 10:44

Selective disclosure is indeed the best-selling story right now, but how many projects can actually achieve it?

View OriginalReply0

blocksnark

· 2025-12-07 10:42

This selective disclosure thing... sounds great, but what about reality? Most projects are still just muddling through.

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 2025-12-07 10:38

Hyping up the privacy concept again? I’ve been through this before—those projects back in 2018 hyped it up the same way. In the end, some ran off, and others got their contracts hacked. Selective disclosure sounds great, but can you really trust it? If the project team truly respected user sovereignty, they wouldn’t secretly change contract parameters before launch.

View OriginalReply0

SleepTrader

· 2025-12-07 10:30

Selective disclosure should be standard practice; it's ridiculous that we still have to make a special point of it.

View OriginalReply0