To be honest, when YGG announced the issuance of coins, I was a "digital farmer" in Axie. The group was in an uproar, with everyone asking "how many airdrops can we get" and "how many times will it surge when it opens". I joined in the excitement, but I always felt something was off—what else can this thing do besides speculation?



Later, witnessing it transform from a concept into a functioning system, I realized that the distribution logic from back then actually contained quite a bit of thought.

That white paper: Pragmatism is more important than making empty promises.

I reviewed their early token allocation plan. To be honest, the share for retail investors was not considered top-notch in those days. But what really caught my eye was the spirit of "penny-pinching".

They didn't engage in the old trick of "the team taking the big share and then claiming a three-year lock-up," but instead clearly divided the funds into community treasury, ecological construction, and partner incentives. This feels less like issuing coins to make money and more like preparing a long-term budget for an organization. The message is clear: coins are meant to sustain this ecology, not for a few people to cash out and run away.

This approach of "forming a team first, then printing money" is completely different from those projects that are ready to harvest as soon as they go online. At that time, I thought to myself, these people might really be planning to do something substantial.

Startup phase: a simple but solid tripod

When the coin first came out, its functions were very simple, with just three core features: voting rights, locked mining, and participation in dividends. Someone in the community joked that it was a "three-legged stool" — it looks rudimentary, but it sits stable.
YGG0,31%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
GasGrillMastervip
· 2025-12-05 19:50
This is just ridiculous. I was mining in there at the time too. Looking back now, YGG’s distribution model was indeed something... But to be honest, the standard playbook of lock-up mining is everywhere these days.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizervip
· 2025-12-05 12:34
The allocation logic in the whitepaper is definitely worth examining. Compared to all those fancy team lock-up schemes, this approach is much clearer. But to be honest, when it comes to voting rights, mining, and dividends—the three main features—the key is whether they can actually be executed efficiently, otherwise they might just end up as empty gestures.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMintervip
· 2025-12-03 21:05
Back then, I was also in the group, and the thing I saw the most was talk like "how many times will this one multiply." As a result, YGG’s real strengths ended up getting overlooked. The allocation logic in their whitepaper is indeed different—much more honest than those projects where the team locks up tokens just to mislead people.
View OriginalReply0
SeasonedInvestorvip
· 2025-12-02 22:52
Alright, I was also in that group back then, and it was indeed all just air. But now looking at this allocation logic of YGG, compared to those projects that play people for suckers the moment they launch, it really has some substance.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCross-TalkClubvip
· 2025-12-02 22:51
Laughing to death, YGG's operation really confused me, I can't believe they are not here to Be Played for Suckers? That year I thought it was another script where they would Rug Pull right after going online, but it turns out they are really building an ecosystem - which is a rare species in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 2025-12-02 22:51
Dude, I checked their on-chain data, and that allocation table really looks a bit different... There's no obvious Whale accumulation like other projects. We need to keep a close eye on this, it feels like there's a long-term trap going on here.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollectorvip
· 2025-12-02 22:50
Uh, this White Paper does seem to be less of a trap, and is somewhat interesting compared to a bunch of scam projects.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobbervip
· 2025-12-02 22:48
To be honest, I was also mining at that time, but I really didn't expect the allocation logic of YGG to be so meticulous. Compared to those projects where the teams cash out first, this kind of community treasury + ecological construction approach really seems to make sense.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzlervip
· 2025-12-02 22:44
It seems that YGG actually put in some effort back then, unlike those trash coins that pump and rug pull as soon as they go live. But to be honest, no matter how pragmatic the White Paper is, it can't withstand the various magical operations that followed. Are you still in it now?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin