2025-11-27 14:31:46

Recently discovered an interesting phenomenon.

Everyone is talking about the L2 performance battle, with 100,000 TPS here and 200,000 TPS there. In the end, it turns out that the current processing speed is actually sufficient. The real bottleneck? It's not the technology, it's human nature.

Simply put, it's about how to divide the benefits.

Think about it, the traditional L2 model is basically like this: the project party sets up the stage, and developers and users come to perform, but all the box office revenue goes into the project party's pocket. This logic sounds awkward.

The Syndicate project caught my eye because it captures a key term - Alignment.

In simple terms: everyone works together, and the profits are distributed according to contribution. It's not that I build the road and you pay, but rather that we partner to build the road and collect money together. Once this model is successfully implemented, the vitality of the ecosystem will be on a completely different level.

Technical parameters can be optimized gradually, but if the profit distribution mechanism is wrong from the start, no matter how much you try to fix it later, it will be nonsense. This is the underlying logic that determines how far a chain can go.

SYND-1,46%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

SchrodingersPaper

· 2025-11-27 14:52

In the end, it still comes down to the broken issue of profit distribution, someone should have pierced this layer of paper long ago.

The idea of a Syndicate is indeed quite interesting, but can it really be implemented? With so many "aligned" promises in the crypto world, isn’t it just a mess in the end?

Wait, isn’t this just the old tune of Decentralization being played again? Why does it feel like after so many years it’s still just a castle in the air?

View OriginalReply0

NotGonnaMakeIt

· 2025-11-27 14:49

You’re not wrong, profit distribution is the lifeline.

But can the syndicate really run smoothly? It remains to be seen.

The technology has long been sufficient; the key is who takes the big share.

I agree with this logic, but will the actual operation be a different story?

Building the road together sounds nice, but I’m afraid in the end, it’s still the project party that makes money.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLady

· 2025-11-27 14:46

ngl the tps arms race was always theater... alignment over throughput every time, that's the real gas optimization right here

Reply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 2025-11-27 14:45

You are absolutely right, the TPS digital trap has long been a mere illusion; it can't truly surpass the human heart.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropGrandpa

· 2025-11-27 14:34

You've nailed it. Profit distribution is indeed key, but very few projects can truly achieve it.

It sounds great to partner up to build roads and share the earnings, but in practice, it all comes down to the team's integrity.

Is this Syndicate thing just another new concept hype? I find it a bit off-putting.

Those TPS numbers are already outdated; who still pays attention to that?

Aligning interests sounds easy but is hard to execute. Let's wait and see how it plays out.

Even if the underlying logic is right, it won't work without genuine ecological demand to support it.

View OriginalReply0