Introduction: Investment Comparison of AMC vs VET
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between AI Meta Club (AMC) and VeChain (VET) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.
AI Meta Club (AMC): Launched in 2023, it has gained market recognition for its focus on AI and Metaverse technology integration.
VeChain (VET): Since its inception in 2017, it has been hailed as a pioneer in enterprise blockchain solutions, becoming one of the most widely adopted cryptocurrencies for supply chain management.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between AMC and VET, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question that concerns investors most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
- 2025: AMC reached its all-time high of $5 on March 13, 2025, likely due to significant project developments or market enthusiasm.
 
- 2021: VET hit its all-time high of $0.280991 on April 19, 2021, possibly influenced by broader crypto market bullishness and VeChain ecosystem growth.
 
- Comparative Analysis: In recent market cycles, AMC dropped from its $5 high to a low of $0.0357, while VET declined from its peak of $0.280991 to current levels around $0.01548, showing significant volatility in both assets.
 
Current Market Situation (2025-10-31)
- AMC current price: $0.0626
 
- VET current price: $0.01548
 
- 24-hour trading volume: AMC $14,670.30 vs VET $635,337.23
 
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 34 (Fear)
 
Click to view real-time prices:

Impact of Key Factors on AMC vs VET Investment Value
Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)
- AMC: The company issues shares through traditional equity markets with supply influenced by corporate actions such as stock issuances and buybacks
 
- VET: Fixed maximum supply with two-token system (VET for value transfer and VTHO for transaction costs)
 
- 📌 Historical Pattern: Supply mechanisms drive different price cycles, with AMC subject to equity market dynamics while VET follows cryptocurrency market patterns
 
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional Holdings: VET has gained traction with enterprise partners through VeChainThor blockchain solutions
 
- Enterprise Adoption: AMC focuses on entertainment industry applications, while VET is used in supply chain management, authenticity verification, and carbon emission tracking
 
- Regulatory Attitudes: Different regulatory approaches across countries, with entertainment stocks like AMC facing fewer restrictions than cryptocurrencies like VET
 
Technology Development and Ecosystem Building
- AMC Technology Upgrades: Digital platform enhancements focusing on streaming services and customer experience
 
- VET Technology Development: Continuous blockchain protocol improvements with PoA consensus mechanism and enterprise-focused solutions
 
- Ecosystem Comparison: VET offers smart contract capabilities, DeFi applications, and supply chain tracking, while AMC focuses on entertainment distribution channels
 
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Performance During Inflation: Both assets respond differently to inflation pressures
 
- Monetary Policy Impact: Interest rates and USD strength affect both AMC stock valuation and VET cryptocurrency pricing
 
- Geopolitical Factors: International trade tensions influence VET's supply chain applications, while entertainment industry regulations impact AMC
 
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: AMC vs VET
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- AMC: Conservative $0.056966 - $0.0626 | Optimistic $0.0626 - $0.08764
 
- VET: Conservative $0.0096038 - $0.01549 | Optimistic $0.01549 - $0.0176586
 
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- AMC may enter a growth phase, with prices expected in the range of $0.038885868 - $0.086158884
 
- VET may enter a steady growth phase, with prices expected in the range of $0.01845714048 - $0.02095654492
 
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETFs, ecosystem development
 
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- AMC: Base scenario $0.1054581309054 - $0.149750545885668 | Optimistic scenario up to $0.149750545885668
 
- VET: Base scenario $0.024810828441454 - $0.029772994129744 | Optimistic scenario up to $0.029772994129744
 
View detailed price predictions for AMC and VET
Disclaimer: This analysis is based on historical data and market projections. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. This information should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.
AMC:
| 年份 | 
预测最高价 | 
预测平均价格 | 
预测最低价 | 
涨跌幅 | 
| 2025 | 
0.08764 | 
0.0626 | 
0.056966 | 
0 | 
| 2026 | 
0.0773736 | 
0.07512 | 
0.0653544 | 
20 | 
| 2027 | 
0.086158884 | 
0.0762468 | 
0.038885868 | 
21 | 
| 2028 | 
0.10881180828 | 
0.081202842 | 
0.04790967678 | 
29 | 
| 2029 | 
0.1159089366708 | 
0.09500732514 | 
0.071255493855 | 
51 | 
| 2030 | 
0.149750545885668 | 
0.1054581309054 | 
0.080148179488104 | 
68 | 
VET:
| 年份 | 
预测最高价 | 
预测平均价格 | 
预测最低价 | 
涨跌幅 | 
| 2025 | 
0.0176586 | 
0.01549 | 
0.0096038 | 
0 | 
| 2026 | 
0.021878076 | 
0.0165743 | 
0.008784379 | 
7 | 
| 2027 | 
0.02095654492 | 
0.019226188 | 
0.01845714048 | 
24 | 
| 2028 | 
0.0267215173918 | 
0.02009136646 | 
0.0162740068326 | 
29 | 
| 2029 | 
0.026215214957008 | 
0.0234064419259 | 
0.016150444928871 | 
51 | 
| 2030 | 
0.029772994129744 | 
0.024810828441454 | 
0.018111904762261 | 
60 | 
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: AMC vs VET
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- AMC: Suitable for investors focused on AI and Metaverse potential
 
- VET: Suitable for investors interested in enterprise blockchain solutions and supply chain management
 
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: AMC: 30% vs VET: 70%
 
- Aggressive investors: AMC: 60% vs VET: 40%
 
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
 
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risks
- AMC: High volatility due to nascent AI and Metaverse market
 
- VET: Dependency on enterprise adoption and supply chain industry trends
 
Technical Risks
- AMC: Scalability, network stability
 
- VET: Hash rate concentration, security vulnerabilities
 
Regulatory Risks
- Global regulatory policies may have different impacts on both assets
 
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- AMC advantages: Focus on emerging AI and Metaverse technologies
 
- VET advantages: Established enterprise partnerships and practical use cases in supply chain management
 
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a balanced approach with a slight preference for VET due to its established use cases
 
- Experienced investors: Explore a diversified portfolio including both AMC and VET based on risk tolerance
 
- Institutional investors: Evaluate VET for its enterprise solutions while monitoring AMC's growth in the AI and Metaverse sectors
 
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between AMC and VET?
A: AMC focuses on AI and Metaverse technology integration, launched in 2023. VET, launched in 2017, specializes in enterprise blockchain solutions for supply chain management.
Q2: How do the current prices of AMC and VET compare?
A: As of October 31, 2025, AMC's price is $0.0626, while VET's price is $0.01548.
Q3: What are the long-term price predictions for AMC and VET?
A: By 2030, AMC is predicted to reach $0.1054581309054 - $0.149750545885668, while VET is expected to reach $0.024810828441454 - $0.029772994129744.
Q4: How do the supply mechanisms of AMC and VET differ?
A: AMC issues shares through traditional equity markets, while VET has a fixed maximum supply with a two-token system (VET and VTHO).
Q5: What are the main risk factors for investing in AMC and VET?
A: AMC faces high volatility due to the nascent AI and Metaverse market, while VET's risks include dependency on enterprise adoption and supply chain industry trends. Both face potential regulatory risks.
Q6: How should investors allocate their portfolio between AMC and VET?
A: Conservative investors might consider 30% AMC and 70% VET, while aggressive investors could opt for 60% AMC and 40% VET. However, individual allocations should be based on personal risk tolerance and investment goals.