Recently, everyone has been talking about AI agents on the blockchain for automatic interactions. I also got curious and tried it out. Honestly, it can just "click buttons" for me, but the safety net still relies on humans. For example, when authorizing, the agent dares to give you all-in unlimited approval—I get chills just thinking about it; and for cross-chain/chain swapping, miscalculating gas and getting stuck halfway, I still end up paying out of pocket to fix it. The modular approach and the narrative development at the DAO layer are topics developers are excited about, but as a user, I only care: is my signing requirement reduced, or are the risks made more hidden? My colleague saw me talking to myself over a bunch of transaction records and said, "You're not saving trouble; you're outsourcing the hassle to a robot." Forget it, automation is fine, but I still manually monitor the three key steps: signing, permissions, and withdrawals. Don’t trust “full automation” too much.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin