Recently, I've been seeing a bunch of AI Agents claiming "fully automated on-chain operations," and honestly, I can't help but laugh and get angry at the same time: the signing step always requires human oversight, right? It can help you click buttons, set Gas, even automatically swap tokens, but the question of "who am I authorizing, how much limit am I giving, and whether I might drain the entire wallet"—ultimately, that's on you to bear. Not to mention cross-chain bridges and routers, which are hidden in the UI like Easter eggs; if the Agent takes the wrong path, even if the transaction hash is clear, it just proves you were the one who screwed up.

And the same goes for those blockchain games that crash during economic collapses—inflation, studios, and token price spirals—Agents are actually better at making the pitfalls even faster and more predictable: they only execute "maximize profit," and won't remind you when it's time to stop that "thing is already rotten." Frankly, what on-chain interactions most need human oversight isn't operation, but judgment: whether the authorization is reasonable, whether the protocol is trustworthy, whether I should chase after a failed transaction to fix it... Anyway, when I see the words "fully automatic," my hand instinctively covers the confirm button. What about you?