Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I just read something interesting that Vitalik Buterin recently proposed about how to fund open-source projects. The founder of Ethereum suggested an idea that I find quite innovative: "dependence funding."
Basically, the concept is this: instead of relying on traditional donations or corporations eventually acquiring open-source projects, Vitalik proposes a model where developers receive direct compensation because other projects depend on their code. He gave an example I liked: imagine a developer who is not in the crypto world, but their work is used by multiple Ethereum projects. That developer could receive 1.5 ETH as recognition for that dependence.
What I find relevant is that Vitalik Buterin sees this as something more authentic than simply giving away money without context. It’s a model that combines financial support with real reach, with the impact that the code generates in the ecosystem.
And here’s the interesting part: Vitalik believes this should expand beyond Ethereum. He mentioned projects like Tor, which are not specifically cryptocurrencies but greatly benefit the crypto community. The idea is that the intersection between crypto and non-crypto is becoming stronger, and these funding mechanisms could be key to maintaining the independence of critical initiatives.
In my opinion, this is important because many open-source projects end up being acquired or compromised simply due to lack of resources. If Vitalik Buterin’s model expands, we could see a completely different way to keep decentralized innovation alive without projects having to sell their soul to the highest bidder.