Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
You hear the term “modularization” so much—frankly, the most intuitive changes for ordinary users come down to just two things: transfers/interactions don’t feel as painful, and there are so many chains that people can’t remember them. In the past, squeezing onto one chain meant lag and higher costs; now execution and settlement are split apart, so the experience is a bit smoother, but you end up switching back and forth across more bridges and more asset versions... My biggest fear on weekends is this part—when there are more steps, the probability of something going wrong goes up too.
Recently, those new L1/L2s that come out and start issuing incentives to pull in TVL—I really understand why old users complain about “mining to sell.” For end users, “modularization” isn’t a faith; it’s something you need to look at one more time before you click confirm: which chain it’s on, which bridge it’s going through, and whether it’s just a temporary wave of hype. Anyway, I’d rather it be a little slower than wake up to alarms going off everywhere.