Recently, I was reading through governance forums and it gave me a headache. They talk about "community voting," but in the end, a bunch of people delegate their votes to a few big accounts, which looks a lot like a shareholders' meeting... Who exactly is the governance token governing? Honestly, it's probably more about "who has more time and influence." I also delegate sometimes—being lazy is real—but every time I click confirm, I feel like I'm sending my power off in a package.

Cross-chain bridges get hacked again, and everyone rushes to "wait for confirmation" after that oracle incident with the abnormal quotes. But I’m actually more worried: once this default consensus is influenced by a few delegated nodes, the risk boundary becomes their mood line. What I don’t regret is that I at least drew a small chart of my delegated voting records and saved it in my favorites. Every now and then, I take a look, and it makes me feel more at ease... Anyway, I’m not here to be an activist.