Lately I've been looking at stablecoins again, and the more I look, the more I feel that de-pegging is often not "broken," but people's trust has already been compromised: everyone is shouting about reserve transparency, yet when a little wind blows, they rush to run, and bank runs are just so self-consistent. To put it simply, transparency just exposes the problem; it can't guarantee that no one will jump the gun first. Also, on-chain data tools and label systems are criticized for being laggy and potentially misleading, which I also resonate with. Some "security labels" make me sleep better, but I later found out they update slowly, almost leading me to be gently drained… At that moment, I unfollowed a few accounts, and after two days of calm, I followed one back: it's not that it suddenly became accurate, but that I understood now—tools are just flashlights, not bodyguards. Anyway, now I look at reserves first to see if they can be redeemed at any time, who is backing them, and not to overly trust pretty reports.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin